Wikireligion talk:Policies
From Wikireligion
(Difference between revisions)
(→Civility: but...) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::He may be rude but he is right, and if you can't reconize that, I honestly don't think you should lead this wiki, especially since I am apparently younger than you. -- {{userinfo|RyGuy}} 10:09, 9 March 2007 (EST) | :::He may be rude but he is right, and if you can't reconize that, I honestly don't think you should lead this wiki, especially since I am apparently younger than you. -- {{userinfo|RyGuy}} 10:09, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
::::Troll. [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 18:55, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ::::Troll. [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 18:55, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
- | + | :::::What? Who are you saying is a troll? -- {{userinfo|RyGuy}} 09:19, 3 May 2007 (EDT) | |
==Civility== | ==Civility== | ||
Current revision as of 13:19, 3 May 2007
so there are no policies in effect here? GREAT! Let me invite all my vandal friends. INSANITY!!!! Seven of nine 23:19, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- He does have a good (slightly rude) point. -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 07:26, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- He is very rude. He does not know when to not say something. --Sir James Paul 09:39, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Civility
Based on the comments of AntiChrist (calling people "morons") and the comments above (*sigh*), I think we should put a civility policy into effect; I've seen enough rude comments already in the short spam of time that I've been here to know that Wikireligion desperately needs one. Wikipedia has a great civility policy, so perhaps we should model off of it. -- P.B. Pilhet 17:30, 15 March 2007 (EST)
Support as above. Wikipedia policy sounds fine. ForestH2 18:19, 15 March 2007 (EST)