Index.php

From Wikifutbol

Revision as of 07:18, 8 April 2013 by 173.237.182.86 (Talk)

In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry testified prior to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and pictured American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the country of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed villages in a trend similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know about the rape and pain aspect, but I do know that each time I shot to popularity on a goal in Vietnam I m...

I am a war offender. Yes, you heard correctlya war offender! I would like to describe why.

In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and shown American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed communities in a style reminiscent of Genghis Khan. I dont know in regards to the rape and pain part, but I do know that every time I shot to popularity on a goal in Vietnam I made a sacred vow that any Viet Cong or North Vietnam Army soldier I caught targeting or attempting to ambush our troops on the floor would definitely suffer a lot of pain and probably drop his life. Is that any unique of razing a village where insurgents hid throughout the day and introduced problems through the night? I dont think so. As I see it, if the Americans who struggled so valiantly on the ground throughout the Vietnam War are war thieves, then so am I.

Without question, John Kerrys depiction of American soldiers terrorists, and the opponent as victims of a barbaric U.S. military which tortures and murders helpless civilians was extremely popular with the likes of Jane Fonda and other people of the anti-war motion, and at the same time, presented an extended and effective political career which culminated with his defeated bet for the presidency.

But 1971 was quite a while before. Could it be really important that people discuss this matter today? For a special group of American heros it is more important than actually, since they have to set the record directly. I'm discussing those that were captured and used as prisoners of war. In 1971, a number of our POWs were moving into circumstances of incredible depravation in camps with euphemistic names just Like The Hanoi Hilton, and The Zoo. It was a life of distress, where pain and beatings were everyday cost and many died of misery and condition.

Many POWs never likely to be freedespecially since their captors told them which they would ultimately be tried and completed because of their war crimes. Imagine their despair when among their own told the planet that they were war criminals. The North Vietnamese government could not have asked for an improved advertising adviser than John Kerry!

I thought I would never say this, but here goesthank God we are now living in a litigious culture! Several POWs, veterans, and other like-minded people have shaped a company called Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF).

The building blocks recently submitted a lawsuit with respect to Carlton A. Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, against Kenneth J. Campbell and Jon Bjornson, two contacts and aides of Kerrys during the 2004 presidential strategy, both of whom are Vietnam Veterans and longtime anti-war activists. The basis of the suit is also difficult to describe here, however you can study everything on the VVLF internet site, that is In summary, Mister Sherwood created a documentary called Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal. The picture was never seen since Sinclair Broadcasting Companythe only community brave enough to air the documentarywas power to withdraw after Kerry colleagues threatened them with libel matches and also lack of their transmission license. If what the law states suit proceeds as planned, details of this energy, plus Kerrys activity in 1971 will be mentioned in available court and develop into a matter of public history. And when that happens, a lot of liberals and antiwar activists are going to be really sad.

I'm no activist, significantly less a philanthropist. As an issue of fact, I am just about a political separate. But fair is fair, and when I learned that the VVLF is struggling to fund this extremely important and famous suit I achieved for my billfold and put my money in the pot. You can perform as you want, but I believe that as a, every American is going to the VVLF site and listen to their side of the story. Their the best thing to do. Once again, their site is In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed ahead of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and portrayed American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the country of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed villages in a trend similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know in regards to the rape and torture portion, but I do know that each time I took off on a goal in Vietnam I m...

I am a war criminal. Yes, you heard correctlya war offender! I want to explain why.

In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and described American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed neighborhoods in a style similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know in regards to the rape and pain element, but I do know that every time I became popular on a mission in Vietnam I made a holy promise that any Viet Cong or North Vietnam Army soldier I found fighting or wanting to wait our troops on the floor was going to suffer plenty of pain and probably drop his life. Is that any different than razing a town where insurgents put through the day and launched problems at night? I dont think so. As I see it, if the Americans who fought so valiantly on a lawn through the Vietnam War are war thieves, then so am I.

Without issue, John Kerrys characterization of American soldiers terrorists, and the enemy as patients of a savage U.S. military which tortures and killings helpless civilians was wildly common with the likes of Jane Fonda and other people of the anti-war activity, and at the same time, presented a long and effective political career which culminated with his defeated bet for the presidency.

But 1971 was a long time ago. Is it really important that individuals examine this matter now? For a unique band of American heros it is more important than actually, because they need certainly to set the report straight. I'm referring to those that were captured and held as criminals of war. In 1971, a number of our POWs were residing in conditions of incredible depravation in camps with euphemistic names just Like The Hanoi Hilton, and The Zoo. It absolutely was a life of distress, where pain and beatings were everyday ticket and several died of hunger and illness.

Most POWs never expected to be freedespecially since their captors told them that they could eventually be tried and performed for their war crimes. Imagine their despair when certainly one of their particular told the entire world they were war criminals. The North Vietnamese government couldn't have asked for an improved promotion adviser than John Kerry!

I thought I would never say this, but here goesthank God we are now living in a litigious culture! A small grouping of POWs, experts, and other like-minded people have formed a business named Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF).

The inspiration recently filed case with respect to Carlton A. Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, against Kenneth J. Campbell and Jon Bjornson, two associates and aides of Kerrys during the 2004 presidential campaign, both of whom are Vietnam Veterans and original anti-war activists. The foundation of the match is too complex to explain here, however, you may study every detail on the VVLF site, that is In a nutshell, Mister Sherwood made a documentary named Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal. The video was never seen since Sinclair Broadcasting Companythe only system brave enough to air the documentarywas pressure to withdraw after Kerry contacts threatened them with libel matches and also loss of their broadcasting license. If the law match proceeds as planned, details of this effort, plus Kerrys action in 1971 is going to be discussed in available judge and become a matter of public report. And when that takes place, a lot of liberals and antiwar activists will be very disappointed.

I am no activist, much less a philanthropist. As an issue of fact, I'm virtually a political separate. But fair is fair, and when I discovered that the VVLF is struggling to fund this extremely important and famous lawsuit I reached for my billfold and put my money in the container. You can perform as you like, but I do believe that as a, every American should go to the VVLF site and listen to their area of the story. Its the proper thing to do. Yet again, their website is

Personal tools