Philip's notes
From Webstock
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Premise== | ||
* web 2.0 = different mindset, tools are (nearly) the same as Web 1.0 | * web 2.0 = different mindset, tools are (nearly) the same as Web 1.0 | ||
| - | * style vs substance? | + | * What's the problem: style vs substance? Just a label for a trend. |
| - | * | + | * Maturity of the tools: browsers + javascript + databases |
| - | * | + | * Maturity of the market: wikipedia, blogs, myspace - people now have the mindset/expectation to write online, not just read |
| + | * Does web 2.0 = Google? | ||
| - | * | + | ==Key characteristics== |
| - | * | + | * distributed platform |
| + | * network effects - better the more people use it | ||
| + | * read write platform | ||
| + | * web OS | ||
| + | [http://turntable.com/blog/2007/02/09/web-as-platform-the-video/ Web as platform: The video] | ||
| + | * network is the computer | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Examples== | ||
| + | * Delicious, Flickr - i collect for me, i define on my own terms, i share - the sum is greater than the parts, gets better the more people use it | ||
| + | * Flickr vs Ofoto | ||
| + | * iTunes vs Last.fm | ||
| + | [http://www.hypergene.net/ideas/amazon_2.html amazoning the news] | ||
| + | * Amazon S3 | ||
| Line 12: | Line 26: | ||
* adwords | * adwords | ||
* ebay, trademe, craigslist - global marketplace | * ebay, trademe, craigslist - global marketplace | ||
| + | |||
working anywhere, anytime | working anywhere, anytime | ||
* shescrafty, turntable - working for clients around the world via email, chat, web | * shescrafty, turntable - working for clients around the world via email, chat, web | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
connecting with friends and family | connecting with friends and family | ||
| Line 31: | Line 36: | ||
| - | Ethics and ethos | + | ==Ethics and ethos== |
* decentralisation | * decentralisation | ||
* is Google centralising the internet? | * is Google centralising the internet? | ||
| Line 38: | Line 43: | ||
* consciousness and politics | * consciousness and politics | ||
* DNA | * DNA | ||
| - | * | + | * Advertising is evil. Is Google making advertising not evil? |
Revision as of 05:16, 1 June 2007
Contents |
Premise
- web 2.0 = different mindset, tools are (nearly) the same as Web 1.0
- What's the problem: style vs substance? Just a label for a trend.
- Maturity of the tools: browsers + javascript + databases
- Maturity of the market: wikipedia, blogs, myspace - people now have the mindset/expectation to write online, not just read
- Does web 2.0 = Google?
Key characteristics
- distributed platform
- network effects - better the more people use it
- read write platform
- web OS
- network is the computer
Examples
- Delicious, Flickr - i collect for me, i define on my own terms, i share - the sum is greater than the parts, gets better the more people use it
- Flickr vs Ofoto
- iTunes vs Last.fm
- Amazon S3
- the means of production have never been more accessible, and more powerful
- ruby on rails
- adwords
- ebay, trademe, craigslist - global marketplace
working anywhere, anytime
- shescrafty, turntable - working for clients around the world via email, chat, web
connecting with friends and family
making new friends
Ethics and ethos
- decentralisation
- is Google centralising the internet?
- copyright and DRM
- info wants to be free
- consciousness and politics
- DNA
- Advertising is evil. Is Google making advertising not evil?
