Main Page

(Difference between revisions)

Current revision as of 19:02, 8 March 2012

Wiki for the [Webstock] Web 2.0 debate.

rythSh Really appreciate you sharing this blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Wiki for the [[http://webstock.org.nz Webstock]] Web 2.0 debate.
-==Web 2.0 debate==
+rythSh Really appreciate you sharing this blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.
-Our position is to argue against the statement: "Web 2.0 is all fizz and no substance"
-===Philip's Notes===
-web 2.0 = different mindset, tools are (nearly) the same as Web 1.0
-style vs substance?
-maturity of the tools: browsers + javascript + databases
-maturity of the market: wikipedia, blogs, myspace - people now have the mindset/expectation to write online, not just read
-delicious, flickr - i collect for me, i define on my own terms, i share
-flickr vs ofoto
-the means of production have never been more accessible, and more powerful
-ruby on rails
-[http://turntable.com/blog/2007/02/09/web-as-platform-the-video/ Web as platform: The video]
-read write platform
-web OS
-[http://www.hypergene.net/ideas/amazon_2.html amazoning the news]
-network effects - better the more people use it
-business
-ebay, trademe, craigslist - marketplace
-reaching customers around the world
-connecting with friends and family
-making new friends
-shescrafty, turntable - working for clients around the world via email, chat, web
-===Brenda's Notes===
-* the body of web 2.0-ish content is substantive in itself
-* numbers of blogs
-* wikis
-* This guy has an interesting take on twitter - that essentially it helps middle-aged men connect with each other and be part of the world ... odd that!