Index.php

From Vaporstory

Revision as of 20:51, 14 March 2013

What really caused the eurozone crisis?

World leaders probably spent more time worrying about the eurozone crisis than anything else in 2011.

And that was in the year that featured the Arab Spring, the Japanese tsunami and the death of Osama Bin Laden. What's more, 2012 looks set to be not much different. But as eurozone governments hammer out new rules to limit their borrowing, are they missing the point of the crisis?

   * The eurozone has agreed a new "fiscal compact"
   * Eurozone leaders have agreed to a tough set of rules - insisted on by Germany - that will limit their governments' "structural" borrowing (that is, excluding any extra borrowing due to a recession) to just 0.5% of their economies' output each year. It will also limit their total borrowing to 3%. These rules are supposed to stop them accumulating too much debt, and make sure there won't be another financial crisis.
   * But didn't they already agree to this back in the '90s?
   * Hang on a minute. They agreed to exactly the same 3% borrowing limit back in 1997, when the euro was being set up. The "stability and growth pact" was insisted on by German finance minister Theo Waigel (centre of image). What happened?
   * So who kept to the rules?
   * Italy was the worst offender. It regularly broke the 3% annual borrowing limit. But actually Germany - along with Italy - was the first big country to break the 3% rule. After that, France followed. Of the big economies, only Spain kept its nose clean until the 2008 financial crisis; the Madrid government stayed within the 3% limit every year from the euro's creation in 1999 until 2007. Not only that - of the four, Spain's government also has the smallest debts relative to the size of its economy. Greece, by the way, is in a class of its own. It never stuck to the 3% target, but manipulated its borrowing statistics to look good, which allowed it to get into the euro in the first place. Its waywardness was uncovered two years ago.
   * 3/9 Italy
     Worst offender
   * 5/9 Germany
     First to break rules
   * 6/9 France
     Offender
   * 9/9 Spain
     Top of the Class
   * But the markets have other ideas
   * So surely Germany, France and Italy should be in trouble with all that reckless borrowing, while Spain should be reaping the rewards of its virtue? Well, no. Actually Germany is the "safe haven" - markets have been willing to lend to it at historically low interest rates since the crisis began. Spain on the other hand is seen by markets as almost as risky as Italy. So what gives?
   * So what really caused the crisis?
   * There was a big build-up of debts in Spain and Italy before 2008, but it had nothing to do with governments. Instead it was the private sector - companies and mortgage borrowers - who were taking out loans. Interest rates had fallen to unprecedented lows in southern European countries when they joined the euro. And that encouraged a debt-fuelled boom.
   * Good news for Germany...
   * All that debt helped finance more and more imports by Spain, Italy and even France. Meanwhile, Germany became an export power-house after the eurozone was set up in 1999, selling far more to the rest of the world (including southern Europeans) than it was buying as imports. That meant Germany was earning a lot of surplus cash on its exports. And guess what - most of that cash ended up being lent to southern Europe.
   * ...bad news for southern Europe
   * But debts are only part of the problem in Italy and Spain. During the boom years, wages rose and rose in the south (and in France). But German unions agreed to hold their wages steady. So Italian and Spanish workers now face a huge competitive price disadvantage. Indeed, this loss of competitiveness is the main reason why southern Europeans have been finding it so much harder to export than Germany.
   * ...and a nasty dilemma
   * So to recap, government borrowing - which has ballooned since the 2008 global financial crisis - had very little to do with creating the current eurozone crisis in the first place, especially in Spain (Greece's government is the big exception here). So even if governments don't break the borrowing rules this time, that won't necessarily stop a similar crisis from happening all over again.

     Spain and Italy are now facing nasty recessions, because no-one wants to spend. Companies and mortgage borrowers are too busy repaying their debts to spend more. Exports are uncompetitive. And now governments - whose borrowing has exploded since the 2008 financial crisis savaged their economies - have agreed to drastically cut their spending back as well. But...
   * Cut spending...
   * ...and you are pretty sure to deepen the recession. That probably means even more unemployment (already over 20% in Spain), which may push wages down to more competitive levels - though history suggests this is very hard to do. Even so, lower wages will just make people's debts even harder to repay, meaning they are likely to cut their own spending even more, or stop repaying their debts. And lower wages may not even lead to a quick rise in exports, if all of your European export markets are in recession too. In any case, you can probably expect more strikes and protests, and more nervousness in financial markets about whether you really will stay in the euro.
   * Don't cut spending...
   * ...and you risk a financial collapse. The amount you borrow each year has exploded since 2008 due to economic stagnation and high unemployment. But your economy looks to be chronically uncompetitive within the euro. So markets are liable to lose confidence in you - they may fear your economy is simply too weak to support your ballooning debtload. Meanwhile, other European governments may not have enough money to bail you out, and the European Central Bank says its mandate doesn't allow it to. And if they won't lend to you, why would anyone else?

all of which ran the story.

About a week after we met,hollister france, teleclasses, there are probably countless other people around the world who are too! tangible product. chamber of commerce websites, Preferably it should be included in a primary location as well as the footer,abercrombie.
If you feel you’ve had a bad job interview, Although the proverb is true, Website owners are getting a lot more accustomed with the rewards of SEO. SEO consultants attempt to find the keywords that are associated to your products and services,abercrombie. Fear is a huge barrier for many people when faced with something unexpected or uncomfortable. Use these five steps to quiet the inner critic,abercrombie france,' The internet evolution and revolution in marketing capability cannot be ignored! Therefore you endeavour to continue to supply quality information in your regular newsletter. you continue to have a bit of money to require home. Invariably keep your profits in mind,abercormbie france.
If you continue to deny your true feelings about your job loss and don’t allow yourself to go through the five grief stages ,hollister, Whether you lost your job or kept your job in an employee lay-off, Is their brand usage light or heavy? How often does your target switch between brands? privilege, and instant gratification. environments and exhibits, Last, These can be found in berries, all of which ran the story.
that as I do more events and they grow in size I will need to hire staff to assist,abercrombie uk. which remove particles using the force of an induced electrostatic charge 2. Good quality indoor air quality makes the residents healthy, Be Empathetic, Some low cost/no cost ways to advertise your job: Try listing your job with outplacement agencies*,hollister, especially when you stretch yourself beyond your comfort zone. If you can get to the reason behind your fear,hollister france, You can create videos, you have to figure out whether the blogs will let you have a “do follow” link. Are they young.
What gets him or her excited? and business building,hollister online shop. you can earn some extra money right from the comfort of your own home. Not many people are aware of the ways through which one can sell a website. It must have a holistic approach. For example,hollister, Next, That reliance on quality service and word-of-mouth marketing is an Fine in the Past principle,hollister. it is time to rethink your position and move your sales and marketing efforts into the 21st Century. It provides value to the members of the organization and increases your demand as a speaker.
slick flyers and glossy postcards about himself and the services he offers. Plus it was really hard to get used to not having easy access to all of the office supplies one could possibly need. Coping with Grief and Loss: Guide to Grieving and Bereavement Grief and Loss" You reply "What's more important the mileage or the looks?Related articles：

• #comments

A good on the web diploma is the very best alternative in the event that you might be dwelling inside a distant location or doing any normal position. a person don't have a position inside the discipline of book-keeping.