|
|
| (13 intermediate revisions not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | There are some things that I think need to be decided regarding where we're going with Vaporstory and Minerva. I say we take a vote. --[[User:Wehpudicabok|Wehpudicabok]] 23:49, 23 February 2007 (EST)
| + | Hi, |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==Genre of fiction==
| + | I begin on internet with a directory |
| - | | + | |
| - | What sort of world are we going to make Minerva? I was thinking something sci-fi/fantasy... Sign your name where you think we should go.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====Sci-Fi====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====Fantasy====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====Both====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | * --[[User:Wehpudicabok|Wehpudicabok]] 23:50, 23 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | *--[[User:Coolaaron88|Coolaaron88]] 23:55, 23 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | *--[[User:Spriekachu|Spriekachu]] 17:19, 24 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====Neither====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | '''This topic has been decided'''. We've been operating on the thought that it was decided already for some time, so it looks like we can just close it up now.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==Time period==
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | We need to decide: in what time period is this encyclopedia being written? Pick a rough region and we'll go with something more precise from that. Sign your name in the year range where you want it to be.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====500-1000====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====1000-2000====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====2000-3000====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====3000-5000====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====5000-10000====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | * --[[User:Wehpudicabok|Wehpudicabok]] 23:50, 23 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | * --[[User:Coolaaron88|Coolaaron88]] 23:55, 23 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | *--[[User:Spriekachu|Spriekachu]] 17:19, 24 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | '''This topic has been decided.''' Voting on it is therefore locked. <strike>We would've let it go longer, but [[User:Spriekachu|Josue]] didn't even vote.</strike>
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | '''"yeah i did."''' ~ Josue
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | Okay, fine.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | The current year is 5507.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====Other (specify in your vote)====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==Details on language==
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | The Vaporstory encyclopedia should be written in one of the languages in its story: that is, we claim that the English we use to write is the same as the spoken language within Minerva. How exactly do we go about doing this? I had thought of saying that English was the "[[wikipedia:Esperanto|Esperanto]]" of Minerva, and that as the language was gaining popularity around the world as the project was started, it was unanimously decided that it should be written in the new language, English.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ====English as Esperanto====
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | * {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 17:31, 25 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | *--[[User:Coolaaron88|Coolaaron88]] 18:52, 25 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | *--[[User:Spriekachu|Spriekachu]] 17:19, 24 February 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | *'''For''' this amazing thing. Oh wait, this is not Uncyclopedia VFH? Who cares!?! [[User:Uncyclopedian|Uncyclopedian]] 21:29, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==How To Go About This==
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | The Problem with (re)creating a world as a whole is that it is impossible for a modern man to think archaically efficiently, So I suggest we do this in a backronym fashion that instead of just randomly creating the past we establish the present and then go back and make a past that could possibly explain it. One reference at a time...and do it by link of the page..."Drawing his plan from the great :WarLink: General :NameLink: and his use of :Weapon/Spell/TacticLink:"
| + | |
| - | --[[User:Reco5151216|Jaymee]] 23:35, 1 March 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | :Hmm... I see your point, but I think what we've got going so far can work too, mainly because we haven't put in a tremendous level of detail just yet. I think we'll find ways to sychronize as we go, but I do agree that we should stay a little close to the present for now. That's why we've only been doing general outlines of the past so far. {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 19:02, 2 March 2007 (EST)
| + | |
