Editing Forum:Decisions regarding Vaporstory

There are some things that I think need to be decided regarding where we're going with Vaporstory and Minerva.  I say we take a vote.  --[[User:Wehpudicabok|Wehpudicabok]] 23:49, 23 February 2007 (EST)

Hi  
Has found some interesting clauses on http://forum.spamsoft.bz/ in occasion of a raising of a rating the Internet of projects. 
Whether wished to learn from you really dispatches on e-mail and to forums to lift a rating of the site... 
--------------------------- 
Web Site <a href=http://forum.spamsoft.bz/>http://forum.spamsoft.bz/</a>

==Time period==

We need to decide:  in what time period is this encyclopedia being written?  Pick a rough region and we'll go with something more precise from that.  Sign your name in the year range where you want it to be.

====500-1000====

====1000-2000====

====2000-3000====

====3000-5000====

====5000-10000====

* --[[User:Wehpudicabok|Wehpudicabok]] 23:50, 23 February 2007 (EST)

* --[[User:Coolaaron88|Coolaaron88]] 23:55, 23 February 2007 (EST)

*--[[User:Spriekachu|Spriekachu]] 17:19, 24 February 2007 (EST)

'''This topic has been decided.''' Voting on it is therefore locked.  <strike>We would've let it go longer, but [[User:Spriekachu|Josue]] didn't even vote.</strike>

'''"yeah i did."''' ~ Josue

Okay, fine.

The current year is 5507.

====Other (specify in your vote)====

==Details on language==

The Vaporstory encyclopedia should be written in one of the languages in its story:  that is, we claim that the English we use to write is the same as the spoken language within Minerva.  How exactly do we go about doing this?  I had thought of saying that English was the "[[wikipedia:Esperanto|Esperanto]]" of Minerva, and that as the language was gaining popularity around the world as the project was started, it was unanimously decided that it should be written in the new language, English.

====English as Esperanto====

* {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 17:31, 25 February 2007 (EST)

*--[[User:Coolaaron88|Coolaaron88]] 18:52, 25 February 2007 (EST)

*--[[User:Spriekachu|Spriekachu]] 17:19, 24 February 2007 (EST)

*'''For''' this amazing thing.  Oh wait, this is not Uncyclopedia VFH?  Who cares!?! [[User:Uncyclopedian|Uncyclopedian]] 21:29, 19 May 2007 (EDT)

==How To Go About This==

The Problem with (re)creating a world as a whole is that it is impossible for a modern man to think archaically efficiently, So I suggest we do this in a backronym fashion that instead of just randomly creating the past we establish the present and then go back and make a past that could possibly explain it. One reference at a time...and do it by link of the page..."Drawing his plan from the great :WarLink: General :NameLink: and his use of :Weapon/Spell/TacticLink:"
--[[User:Reco5151216|Jaymee]] 23:35, 1 March 2007 (EST)
:Hmm... I see your point, but I think what we've got going so far can work too, mainly because we haven't put in a tremendous level of detail just yet.  I think we'll find ways to sychronize as we go, but I do agree that we should stay a little close to the present for now.  That's why we've only been doing general outlines of the past so far.  {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 19:02, 2 March 2007 (EST)