Talk:Main Page

From Universalwiki

(Difference between revisions)
(Broken Link - Create Account/LogIn)
(A1Yvid Thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Really Great.)
 
(13 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
getgetc
What a cute site you have here.
What a cute site you have here.
I can tell that you have put a lot of time and work into it.
I can tell that you have put a lot of time and work into it.
Great job!  
Great job!  
-
[http://jeeee.net/url/13473.html trannys] |
+
A1Yvid Thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Really Great.
-
[http://jeeee.net/url/13480.html teen] |
+
-
[http://jeeee.net/url/13449.html sex teacher] |
+
-
[http://jeeee.net/url/13466.html squirt]
+
-
 
+
-
== Wiki image ==
+
-
 
+
-
[[User:Fhko|Fhko]] put this image on the front page:
+
-
 
+
-
[[Image:UniWiki.JPG]]
+
-
 
+
-
I'm not trying to be an asshole or anything, but I don't like having that picture on the front page. Other people might disagree, though...so, please post your thoughts on this: do you want that picture on the front page?
+
-
*I say '''remove'''. I don't like having pictures on the front page, there's already an image on the top left, and I don't really like the picture.[[User:Admin|VDZ]] 16:27, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
+
-
*i say '''keep but change'''.  a picture to represent the wiki is a good idea, but it'd be nicer if it was smaller.  then it could be used in place of the 'universal wiki' text in the top left. - zaroba
+
-
 
+
-
*'''Remove''' I believe honesty is the best policy. That's pretty bad. --[[User:Jayecifer|Jayecifer]] 17:51, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
+
-
 
+
-
== Wiki image, round 2 ==
+
-
[[User:Jayecifer|Jayecifer]] replaced [[User:Fhko|Fhko]]'s image with this:
+
-
 
+
-
[[Image:Wikilogo.gif]]
+
-
 
+
-
So...let's vote again.
+
-
*I say '''keep'''. Although I'm usually against pictures on the front page, this one looks really neat.[[User:Admin|VDZ]] 15:12, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
+
== Recent Additions ==
== Recent Additions ==
Line 40: Line 18:
As you've all noticed, we've been having a lot of spammers recently. A possible solution to stop the spammers is to only allowed registered users to edit. Creating an account is free, but some people don't want to create an account. They might stop editing if we'd switch over to registered-only. Should we disable editing by unregistered users?[[User:Admin|VDZ]] 05:54, 16 June 2007 (EDT)
As you've all noticed, we've been having a lot of spammers recently. A possible solution to stop the spammers is to only allowed registered users to edit. Creating an account is free, but some people don't want to create an account. They might stop editing if we'd switch over to registered-only. Should we disable editing by unregistered users?[[User:Admin|VDZ]] 05:54, 16 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
== Updating and spam-blasting==
 +
 +
[[DeathsHand]] reporting- It seems that this site has not been updated in a while. So, i will try to update any articles that I feel I know enough about. And blast away spam like phasers through a shuttle's hull. 08:15pm 11 February 2008

Current revision as of 12:07, 8 March 2012

getgetc What a cute site you have here. I can tell that you have put a lot of time and work into it. Great job!

A1Yvid Thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

Contents

[edit] Recent Additions

How about a box where new additions to the wiki can be listed, say a top five or something? --Smurfy 20:58, 9 June 2007 (EDT) (tag added by VDZ)

You mean something like Special:Recentchanges? I use it all the time. VDZ 15:09, 13 June 2007 (EDT)

[edit] Protected the main page

I've protected the main page. This means you can't edit it. If you want something changed on the front page, just post it here. (If you're wondering why it's protected: damned spammers change the front page. Changing normal pages is just annoying, but the main page should be left as is. Damn them.)VDZ 14:54, 15 June 2007 (EDT)

[edit] Spam attacks: disable unregistered editing?

As you've all noticed, we've been having a lot of spammers recently. A possible solution to stop the spammers is to only allowed registered users to edit. Creating an account is free, but some people don't want to create an account. They might stop editing if we'd switch over to registered-only. Should we disable editing by unregistered users?VDZ 05:54, 16 June 2007 (EDT)


[edit] Updating and spam-blasting

DeathsHand reporting- It seems that this site has not been updated in a while. So, i will try to update any articles that I feel I know enough about. And blast away spam like phasers through a shuttle's hull. 08:15pm 11 February 2008

Personal tools