User talk:200.165.141.194
From Thikipedia
(wajCWsVsDcsJnuN) |
(→UppUFrgayaZzafg: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
wa joanne u very chio lerhs to anydboy out there can u record the 黄金路 and 扮美达人 put on youtube? please? joanne i think u are very versatile you can do anything.. including just standing there and looking good you look extremly good lols really take care | wa joanne u very chio lerhs to anydboy out there can u record the 黄金路 and 扮美达人 put on youtube? please? joanne i think u are very versatile you can do anything.. including just standing there and looking good you look extremly good lols really take care | ||
| + | |||
| + | == UppUFrgayaZzafg == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, the un-traceability is slightly ovrttsaeed, as I understand it. If you're willing to go to a lot of bother, you can make it more untraceable, but you can't make it completely absolutely untraceable.Is the word dangerous the correct one? I'm thinking disruptive is more accurate. The Internet is described as dangerous , too, but it's disruptive not dangerous.But if he'd used disruptive , would he have gotten as much attention?It's not *just* a political statement. If it works for some purposes micropayments or convenient meso-payments or alternative to national currencies or inflation hedge it's an asset, much like a natural resource. Gold. Petroleum. Fish. Only it's artificial. An artificial resource, like a reverse phone directory, or a bourse, or precious metal made into coins.If a major currency takes a Zimbabwe-style nosedive, we can expect bitcoin bans, that end-user prosecution . Suppress the symptom and create a scapegoat. A two-fer. | ||
Current revision as of 11:03, 17 February 2013
wa joanne u very chio lerhs to anydboy out there can u record the 黄金路 and 扮美达人 put on youtube? please? joanne i think u are very versatile you can do anything.. including just standing there and looking good you look extremly good lols really take care
[edit] UppUFrgayaZzafg
Well, the un-traceability is slightly ovrttsaeed, as I understand it. If you're willing to go to a lot of bother, you can make it more untraceable, but you can't make it completely absolutely untraceable.Is the word dangerous the correct one? I'm thinking disruptive is more accurate. The Internet is described as dangerous , too, but it's disruptive not dangerous.But if he'd used disruptive , would he have gotten as much attention?It's not *just* a political statement. If it works for some purposes micropayments or convenient meso-payments or alternative to national currencies or inflation hedge it's an asset, much like a natural resource. Gold. Petroleum. Fish. Only it's artificial. An artificial resource, like a reverse phone directory, or a bourse, or precious metal made into coins.If a major currency takes a Zimbabwe-style nosedive, we can expect bitcoin bans, that end-user prosecution . Suppress the symptom and create a scapegoat. A two-fer.
