Talk:Wikihood 2/eps/26
From The Wikihood
< Talk:Wikihood 2(Difference between revisions)
Current revision as of 14:31, 7 August 2008
The plot seems to be straying from the Homestar-centric comedic adventures I thought season 3 would be. <_< 7uWVsc I appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Great. 00:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you want to redirect it back, you can. I'm trying, too. I'm first going to kill Jerxie off somehow. Noxigar 00:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's exactly why I don't contribute anymore, Shadow Scythe. It's too serious. -Great blog post.Really thank you! Want more. 00:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- ...Sorry guys. Although I WAS trying to keep it comedic. My kind of humor won't fly here... Why am I then? In my opinion, humor without some seriousness is just uncoordinated and sloppy. In Strong Bad Emails, one thing DOES lead to another and it requires some serious underlying elements. He replies in a realistic pattern and that keeps the humor from going stale and overused. So whatever, if seriousness goes, then so do I. xPj3YJ A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! 02:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, seriousness is fine. As is some plot. What I don't like, however, is that many of the active Wikihood goers assume that a good plot needs an obvious antagonist. Also, I can't follow all of the Wiki user variants, counterparts, partners, and sidekicks. And Homestar characters don't seem to have enough importance to the plot, neither. 7uWVsc I appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Great. 04:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Antagonists are easy to write for. I suppose you're right about that, though... xPj3YJ A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! 19:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry I began this plot, but this plot was set up in the season finale and I'd like to leave one less plot hole in this hole ridled bag of plot that is Wikihood, and it'll take one episode max to play it out. We can however, involve the H*R characters more in the plot. StrongSader 19:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Eh. Just finish up the plot, and do it quickly. I'll suspend my participation until then. 7uWVsc I appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Great. 22:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- IT'S OVER! xPj3YJ A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! 23:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- This episode is really long. Should it be split in two? 7uWVsc I appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Great. 17:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- IT'S OVER! xPj3YJ A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! 23:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Eh. Just finish up the plot, and do it quickly. I'll suspend my participation until then. 7uWVsc I appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Great. 22:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry I began this plot, but this plot was set up in the season finale and I'd like to leave one less plot hole in this hole ridled bag of plot that is Wikihood, and it'll take one episode max to play it out. We can however, involve the H*R characters more in the plot. StrongSader 19:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Antagonists are easy to write for. I suppose you're right about that, though... xPj3YJ A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! 19:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, seriousness is fine. As is some plot. What I don't like, however, is that many of the active Wikihood goers assume that a good plot needs an obvious antagonist. Also, I can't follow all of the Wiki user variants, counterparts, partners, and sidekicks. And Homestar characters don't seem to have enough importance to the plot, neither. 7uWVsc I appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Great. 04:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- ...Sorry guys. Although I WAS trying to keep it comedic. My kind of humor won't fly here... Why am I then? In my opinion, humor without some seriousness is just uncoordinated and sloppy. In Strong Bad Emails, one thing DOES lead to another and it requires some serious underlying elements. He replies in a realistic pattern and that keeps the humor from going stale and overused. So whatever, if seriousness goes, then so do I. xPj3YJ A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! 02:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's exactly why I don't contribute anymore, Shadow Scythe. It's too serious. -Great blog post.Really thank you! Want more. 00:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
