Talk:Main Page

From Rumblepedia

(Difference between revisions)
(Rethunk)
m (typos)
Line 3: Line 3:
Okay, I've removed it. I've been following (and participating in) several discussions in various places, and this list is already stirring up tension. Everyone's focusing on the "Who's on it/Who's not on it/Who should/shouldn't be on it/Why aren't I on it" aspect of it, and it's not going to end well. It didn't work last time we tried a wiki entry, and it's not going to work this time. If anyone feels an urgent need for some ego-stroking, they're welcome to put the list back up. But for the record, I think it's a supremely bad idea. [[User:Chevan|Chevan]] 22:14, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
Okay, I've removed it. I've been following (and participating in) several discussions in various places, and this list is already stirring up tension. Everyone's focusing on the "Who's on it/Who's not on it/Who should/shouldn't be on it/Why aren't I on it" aspect of it, and it's not going to end well. It didn't work last time we tried a wiki entry, and it's not going to work this time. If anyone feels an urgent need for some ego-stroking, they're welcome to put the list back up. But for the record, I think it's a supremely bad idea. [[User:Chevan|Chevan]] 22:14, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
-
Never mind... after looking over the stuff deleted it over it was probably just someone with a grudge against me or wikipedias in general.  In that case it shouldn't be a long term problem, but if it is; I'll just have to show them the power of Nemo's Eternal Rival! ^_^ - Clouds
+
Never mind... after looking over the stuff deleted, it was probably just someone with a grudge against me or wikipedias in general.  In that case it shouldn't be a long term problem, but if it is; I'll just have to show them the power of Nemo's Eternal Rival! ^_^ - Clouds

Revision as of 23:11, 27 October 2006

I think it might be better if we take off the Rumbles Members section from the Main Page. Thoughts? Chevan 20:32, 20 October 2006 (EDT)

Okay, I've removed it. I've been following (and participating in) several discussions in various places, and this list is already stirring up tension. Everyone's focusing on the "Who's on it/Who's not on it/Who should/shouldn't be on it/Why aren't I on it" aspect of it, and it's not going to end well. It didn't work last time we tried a wiki entry, and it's not going to work this time. If anyone feels an urgent need for some ego-stroking, they're welcome to put the list back up. But for the record, I think it's a supremely bad idea. Chevan 22:14, 21 October 2006 (EDT)

Never mind... after looking over the stuff deleted, it was probably just someone with a grudge against me or wikipedias in general. In that case it shouldn't be a long term problem, but if it is; I'll just have to show them the power of Nemo's Eternal Rival! ^_^ - Clouds

Personal tools