Edit warring
From Rationalwikiwki
(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | '''Edit warring''' is probably one of the things which most irritates the RationalWikans. | + | '''Edit warring''' is probably one of the things which most irritates the RationalWikans. |
Actually, it quite annoys people at RationalWikiWiki as well. Articles subject to edit warring will be protected for one day. Then two days. Then four days. Then eight days. After that we will need to take off our shoes, but we are sure that we can work it out. | Actually, it quite annoys people at RationalWikiWiki as well. Articles subject to edit warring will be protected for one day. Then two days. Then four days. Then eight days. After that we will need to take off our shoes, but we are sure that we can work it out. | ||
- | + | Edit warring happens all over the Internet, at least on Wikis, unless there are procedures to stop it, such as Wikipedia's "three revert rule". | |
[[Category:Unwritten RW procedures]] | [[Category:Unwritten RW procedures]] | ||
[[category:rules]] | [[category:rules]] |
Revision as of 00:44, 17 March 2008
Edit warring is probably one of the things which most irritates the RationalWikans.
Actually, it quite annoys people at RationalWikiWiki as well. Articles subject to edit warring will be protected for one day. Then two days. Then four days. Then eight days. After that we will need to take off our shoes, but we are sure that we can work it out.
Edit warring happens all over the Internet, at least on Wikis, unless there are procedures to stop it, such as Wikipedia's "three revert rule".