User talk:Barbara Shack
From Rationalwikiwki
(→Threats, sadism, etc.) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Now I look at it, I appear to have misread the situation, as have you. RW is in no way linked to RWW, in any official capacity, and none of their views represent ours, etc. --[[User:Oberkommando NeuGwenson|Oberkommando NeuGwenson]] | :Now I look at it, I appear to have misread the situation, as have you. RW is in no way linked to RWW, in any official capacity, and none of their views represent ours, etc. --[[User:Oberkommando NeuGwenson|Oberkommando NeuGwenson]] | ||
| - | I'm talking about the "Stalk this user" boxes on '''this''' Wiki. They will probably disappear now but we all know that they have been there. Police and psychologists aren’t as omniscient as they pretend to be. This applies especially to psychologists. If you (especially a woman) | + | I'm talking about the "Stalk this user" boxes on '''this''' Wiki. They will probably disappear now but we all know that they have been there. Police and psychologists aren’t as omniscient as they pretend to be. This applies especially to psychologists. If you (especially a woman) get into a relationship because you think threat to stalk you was a joke the relationship may later become abusive. Then psychologists are likely to say that the abuse victim brought it on herself because she refused to recognize the obvious threat. If she refuses to develop a relationship because of something as threatening as the user boxes psychologists are inclined to say that it is her fault she is lonely. She shouldn’t have been paranoid over “obvious” jokes. With psychologists you can’t win easily. [[User:Barbara Shack|Barbara Shack]] 05:25, 15 March 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 10:26, 15 March 2008
Welcome to RationalWikiWiki, Barbara Shack. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 19:36, 14 March 2008 (EST)
Threats, sadism, etc.
Care to give examples thereof? What exactly has RW been up to?
You say:
'Then police, psychologists etc will say, 'You were asking for it. They made it clear what they were like.'
What has any RW member done that would merit police intervention? If we have made it clear what we are like, what exactly are we like? Those are some fairly major allegations; if you believe that anything illegal is happening, or about to happen, I suggest that you do something about it/tell us, so that we can stop it. --Oberkommando NeuGwenson
- Now I look at it, I appear to have misread the situation, as have you. RW is in no way linked to RWW, in any official capacity, and none of their views represent ours, etc. --Oberkommando NeuGwenson
I'm talking about the "Stalk this user" boxes on this Wiki. They will probably disappear now but we all know that they have been there. Police and psychologists aren’t as omniscient as they pretend to be. This applies especially to psychologists. If you (especially a woman) get into a relationship because you think threat to stalk you was a joke the relationship may later become abusive. Then psychologists are likely to say that the abuse victim brought it on herself because she refused to recognize the obvious threat. If she refuses to develop a relationship because of something as threatening as the user boxes psychologists are inclined to say that it is her fault she is lonely. She shouldn’t have been paranoid over “obvious” jokes. With psychologists you can’t win easily. Barbara Shack 05:25, 15 March 2008 (EST)
