Operation Gavel is complete. Please proceed directly to the new wiki at http://rr-wiki.net.
This wiki is now locked. Have a nice day.
Randomramblings:VFA
From Randomramblings
(Difference between revisions)
| (17 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==[[Mormon]]== | ==[[Mormon]]== | ||
* ([[User:Kurian|Kurian]] 19:46, 31 October 2006 (EST)) | * ([[User:Kurian|Kurian]] 19:46, 31 October 2006 (EST)) | ||
| - | * | + | * Against, because it's flipping annoying. Seriously, play the fucking game before you say shit --[[User:Adamjirra|Adamjirra]] 23:09, 31 October 2006 (EST) |
| + | *'''Against''' as well. Too much list, not enough content. {{User:Hinoa/sig}} 23:12, 31 October 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == [[TheWalrus]] == | ||
| + | *[[User:Cantryboy|Cantryboy]] 18:07, 7 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *'''Reluctant against.''' This doesn't so much detail TheWalrus himself as it does miscellaneous Walrus-related stuff. It's a long article and fairly well written... it's just more of a wiki-threadjack. Which is sad, as I believe that Walrus was the only one who edited it. ^_^ {{User:Hinoa/sig}} 04:50, 12 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == [[Blue Max]] == | ||
| + | *'''Nommed''' >_> --[[User:Sociopathic amphibian|TeeKayEff]] 17:54, 9 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *'''Against.''' What the fuck? Give him a chance to write it! {{User:Hinoa/sig}} 18:59, 9 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *<strong>For.</strong> This describes him perfectly, I think. [[User:Cantryboy|Cantryboy]] 21:41, 9 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *'''Against.''' Lack of content, and it doesn't do him any justice. Except for the forehead bit. That does. ~ [[User:Janus|Janus]] 22:11, 9 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *'''Against.''' Why even bother? -[[User:Ksumoe|Ksumoe]] 19:54, 14 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | <!-- No voting below this line PLZTHX. --The Management --> | ||
| + | <!-- lol i cun maek html comments 2 :O --Janus --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Previous Features= | ||
| + | == [[Kenny 4 Prez]] == | ||
| + | '''Featured.''' {{User:Hinoa/sig}} 19:03, 7 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *[[User:Cantryboy|Cantryboy]] 20:57, 3 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *Could do with a bit of expansion, but '''for.''' {{User:Hinoa/sig}} 21:14, 3 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *It's got my vote. ~ [[User:Janus|Janus]] 23:41, 3 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | * It's got my vote as well. [[User:Jiggak|Jiggak]] 16:58, 7 November 2006 (EST)--[[User:Jiggak|Jiggak]] 16:58, 7 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | *For, since I wrote the f***ing thing...--[[User:Saurian2076|Saurian2076]] 18:46, 7 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Voting pages]] | [[Category:Voting pages]] | ||
Current revision as of 00:54, 15 November 2006
Welcome, one and all, to the VFA page, where you, the peon common user, can vote for which article on this wiki gets to show up on the front page. The rules are simple:
- If you find an article that deserves a showcasing front and center, place the name of the article in a level 2 header and write below why you think it should be featured.
- If you feel like it, you can nominate your own articles. Just be sure to tell us that it is, in fact, your own article.
- If you think an article listed does (not) qualify for a placing on the front page, write For or Against below, and an optional comment why you voted thusly.
- Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
- Be sure to sign your votes. You do this by typing four tildes at the end of your comment (looks like: ~~~~) or by clicking on the "your signature with timestamp" button above (the
button).
- You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
- Every so often, a sysop will feature a page ("every so often" is roughly equal to three days, but don't count on it). The page will get a fancy {{win}} template on it, and the author gets bragging rights.
- If your article fails to pass nomination, then it will be removed. Don't try to beat the sysops to it; they will probably not like it and beat you.
Contents |
Current Nominations
Mormon
- (Kurian 19:46, 31 October 2006 (EST))
- Against, because it's flipping annoying. Seriously, play the fucking game before you say shit --Adamjirra 23:09, 31 October 2006 (EST)
- Against as well. Too much list, not enough content. —Hinoa (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2006 (EST)
TheWalrus
- Cantryboy 18:07, 7 November 2006 (EST)
- Reluctant against. This doesn't so much detail TheWalrus himself as it does miscellaneous Walrus-related stuff. It's a long article and fairly well written... it's just more of a wiki-threadjack. Which is sad, as I believe that Walrus was the only one who edited it. ^_^ —Hinoa (talk) 04:50, 12 November 2006 (EST)
Blue Max
- Nommed >_> --TeeKayEff 17:54, 9 November 2006 (EST)
- Against. What the fuck? Give him a chance to write it! —Hinoa (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2006 (EST)
- For. This describes him perfectly, I think. Cantryboy 21:41, 9 November 2006 (EST)
- Against. Lack of content, and it doesn't do him any justice. Except for the forehead bit. That does. ~ Janus 22:11, 9 November 2006 (EST)
- Against. Why even bother? -Ksumoe 19:54, 14 November 2006 (EST)
Previous Features
Kenny 4 Prez
Featured. —Hinoa (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2006 (EST)
- Cantryboy 20:57, 3 November 2006 (EST)
- Could do with a bit of expansion, but for. —Hinoa (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2006 (EST)
- It's got my vote. ~ Janus 23:41, 3 November 2006 (EST)
- It's got my vote as well. Jiggak 16:58, 7 November 2006 (EST)--Jiggak 16:58, 7 November 2006 (EST)
- For, since I wrote the f***ing thing...--Saurian2076 18:46, 7 November 2006 (EST)
