Operation Gavel is complete. Please proceed directly to the new wiki at http://rr-wiki.net.
This wiki is now locked. Have a nice day.
Talk:Spammer
From Randomramblings
(Difference between revisions)
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | I don't know about you guys, but I think it's best if we take out the famous spammers part. Besides the fact that letting them be well known like that is actually the reason most do it, having a list like that is a flame war waiting to happen.-- | + | I don't know about you guys, but I think it's best if we take out the famous spammers part. Besides the fact that letting them be well known like that is actually the reason most do it, having a list like that is a flame war waiting to happen. --The Champion |
:Dammit, people, sign your talkposts. Also, we put it there because invariably some fool on RR asks who x person is, and we can just point them here. If too many people think it's a bad idea, then yeah, we can take it back down. --[[User:Talus|Talus]] 15:40, 23 October 2006 (EDT) | :Dammit, people, sign your talkposts. Also, we put it there because invariably some fool on RR asks who x person is, and we can just point them here. If too many people think it's a bad idea, then yeah, we can take it back down. --[[User:Talus|Talus]] 15:40, 23 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Well, I don't see the problem. Three of the four aren't around to complain, and Trees won't object to his past as a spammer. But whatever, I don't care if it goes or stays. ~[[User:Janus|Janus]] 15:50, 23 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
Current revision as of 19:46, 23 October 2006
I don't know about you guys, but I think it's best if we take out the famous spammers part. Besides the fact that letting them be well known like that is actually the reason most do it, having a list like that is a flame war waiting to happen. --The Champion
- Dammit, people, sign your talkposts. Also, we put it there because invariably some fool on RR asks who x person is, and we can just point them here. If too many people think it's a bad idea, then yeah, we can take it back down. --Talus 15:40, 23 October 2006 (EDT)
- Well, I don't see the problem. Three of the four aren't around to complain, and Trees won't object to his past as a spammer. But whatever, I don't care if it goes or stays. ~Janus 15:50, 23 October 2006 (EDT)
