Nikolic et al. (2007)
From Psy3242
(→'''Introduction''') |
(→'''Experiment II''') |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== '''Experiment II''' == | == '''Experiment II''' == | ||
| + | The second experiment looked at semantic associations between shape and color. The Stroop tests were generally the same, except that the objects were associated with their normal colors (example- lemons are always associated with yellow). Interferences were expected if the object was colored in an unusual color. The expectation is that these associations are different than the synaesthetic associations and therefore do not involve the previously described opponent-color channels. Four syneasthetes from Experiment I and 8 control subjects participated in the study. | ||
== '''General Discussion''' == | == '''General Discussion''' == | ||
Revision as of 15:27, 28 April 2008
Contents |
Color Opponency in Synaesthetic Experiences
Introduction
The Stroop task asks participants to say the name of the color a word is written in. Time reaction is measured. The challenging thing about this task is that generally the word written is the name of a different color than the color ink it is written in.
Example of a Stroop Task
In this experiment, thte task is attempting to study grapheme color synaesthesia, which is a neurological condition where perceptions of words or numbers are associated with perception of colors. In synaesthetes, the reaction time is decreased if the ink color of the word being read is the same color as the synaesthetic color association (congruent condition). There is a longer reaction time if the two colors are different (incongruent conditions).
There is a neurological explanation for this as discovered through the use of MRI tests. In the brain, certain neurons perceive and process visual stimuli. These neurons have color-opponent fields. For example, cells excited by red are inhibited by green, and the reverse is true. The same situation exists with cells excited by blue and inhibited by yellow.
This study attempts to identify the neural location of these color interactions. A specific Stroop test was created for this study that created incongruent conditions. One task's real color was opponent to the synaesthetic color, and the other had the real color not opposing the synaesthetic color. The hypothesis is that in the opponent incongruent conditions the two colors would involve the same color channels in the brain, and that in the non-opposing incongruent condition the colors would be perceived by different channels. It was hypothesized that it will take participants longer to name the colors that are opponent.
Experiment I
Experiment II
The second experiment looked at semantic associations between shape and color. The Stroop tests were generally the same, except that the objects were associated with their normal colors (example- lemons are always associated with yellow). Interferences were expected if the object was colored in an unusual color. The expectation is that these associations are different than the synaesthetic associations and therefore do not involve the previously described opponent-color channels. Four syneasthetes from Experiment I and 8 control subjects participated in the study.
