User talk:JimmiePq
From Oklahoma
(Difference between revisions)
(eUSejMeFoqPJ) |
(→jfYvtcVYq: new section) |
||
(One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | + | I should have a what to eexpct from Wake Forest post coming soon, but in the mean time, this game shouldn't deviate too much from what we saw against Nevada. Wake will be dominated at the line from both sides of the ball, doesn't have much of a rushing attack, and lost the starting QB to injury. This should easily be a 24+ point win depending on how early we put in the second/third string.As an aside, I've chuckled all summer long when ever someone mentioned that this game will be a tester. | |
+ | |||
+ | == jfYvtcVYq == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I feel so much happier now I undesrtnad all this. Thanks! |
Current revision as of 13:29, 7 February 2013
I should have a what to eexpct from Wake Forest post coming soon, but in the mean time, this game shouldn't deviate too much from what we saw against Nevada. Wake will be dominated at the line from both sides of the ball, doesn't have much of a rushing attack, and lost the starting QB to injury. This should easily be a 24+ point win depending on how early we put in the second/third string.As an aside, I've chuckled all summer long when ever someone mentioned that this game will be a tester.
[edit] jfYvtcVYq
I feel so much happier now I undesrtnad all this. Thanks!