Talk:363

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 10:31, 28 December 2006 by Finisterre (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | view current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)


Proposed by: --Finisterre 05:31, 28 December 2006 (EST)

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary It doesn't make sense that the accuser is allowed to vote in what needs to be a unanimous decision since they will inevitably vote AGAINST and prevent the unanimous vote. Also, there seems to be no reason to exclude the accused, since by implication they think they're not guilty.

Debate for this proposal shall end Jan 5, 2007 at 00:01.

Debate

Add comments


Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools