Talk:340
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Feedback is welcome. I know that one problem is how to address what happens if there become less active players than elected positions. Hopefully, that never becomes an issue, but feedback would be appreciated. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 00:30, 29 November 2006 (EST) | Feedback is welcome. I know that one problem is how to address what happens if there become less active players than elected positions. Hopefully, that never becomes an issue, but feedback would be appreciated. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 00:30, 29 November 2006 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Debate shall end and voting commence Sunday December 3 at 12:01 AM EST for this proposal. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 22:03, 29 November 2006 (EST) | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == |
Revision as of 03:03, 30 November 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer: Add your summary here
Feedback is welcome. I know that one problem is how to address what happens if there become less active players than elected positions. Hopefully, that never becomes an issue, but feedback would be appreciated. --Tucana25 00:30, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Debate shall end and voting commence Sunday December 3 at 12:01 AM EST for this proposal. --Tucana25 22:03, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Problems I see: Clause 1: "Popular vote" is not defined by Nomicapolis rules. If 330 passes, the term "population" (related to popular) will be defined. This will make a "popular vote" a vote of the Citizens, not us.
Clause 2: The pronoun "they" has no antecedent.
Clause 3.1: "Not all positions will be voted on every month," could be taken to mean that it is a violation of the rules to vote on all positions every month.
Clause 3.2: I'm uncomfortable with the usage of "in writing." We're not actually writing these things, we're typing or posting them.
Clause 3.3: Replace "representatives" with "officials".
Clause 4: Requires an "emergency vote" without a reason (perhaps "A player who becomes inactive loses any official positions they may have held."?). Protocol is misspelled.
Discuss! Applejuicefool 11:12, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against