Talk:397
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}} | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Debate closed by [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT) -- the proposal must now be voted on. | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
| + | # [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 30 May 2007
Proposed by: chuck 11:03, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
I don't like the "wholly void" part; I think it should just be a simple rule of precedence in interpretation, letting the rest of the conflicting rule stand. I don't really like immutable rules anyway. And this is mostly to make myself active again per 362.
Debate
Debate closed by chuck 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT) -- the proposal must now be voted on.
Vote
For
- chuck 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
Against
Abstain
