Talk:370

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Voting open)
(Vote)
Line 28: Line 28:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
-
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add AGAINST vote}}
+
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|3.2|Add AGAINST vote}}
-
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
+
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:04, 19 January 2007 (EST)
 +
#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
=== Abstain ===
=== Abstain ===
-
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add Abstention}}
+
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|3.3|Add Abstention}}
# <!--# ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--# ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
__NOEDITSECTION__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Revision as of 16:04, 19 January 2007


Proposed by: --Finisterre 05:32, 15 January 2007 (EST)


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 18 January 2007 (EST)
This is a proposal to set a limit on maximum negative scores.
This is intended to be a fun way to limit negative scores and at the same time represent the 'anarchic faction' which is gaining popularity in the populace (perhaps.) I think the suggested amount of popularity and point bonus is reasonable without being excessive. --Finisterre 05:32, 15 January 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

I would like to see the popularity bonus limited to once per round to prevent possible abuse. Applejuicefool 10:39, 17 January 2007 (EST)

That seems like a good idea. --Finisterre 13:50, 17 January 2007 (EST)

Debate is now closed. I declare voting open. --Finisterre 08:49, 19 January 2007 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --Finisterre 08:49, 19 January 2007 (EST)


Against

Add AGAINST vote

  1. --Dayd 11:04, 19 January 2007 (EST)


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools