Talk:Judge Election
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate) |
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
| - | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/ | + | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit§ion=2 Add debate comments] |
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Nominations== | ==Nominations== | ||
| + | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit§ion=3 Add Nomination] | ||
I nominate [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST) | I nominate [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST) | ||
==Vote== | ==Vote== | ||
Revision as of 18:07, 25 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
To debate and vote for a Judge. --TomFoolery 10:40, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
NOTE: The link above is messed up. Please fix, then delete this note (I'd do it, but I'm not sure how).
I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom. If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling. Applejuicefool 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Nominations
I nominate Applejuicefool --TomFoolery 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)
