Talk:306/vote-archive-1
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→For) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 22:33, 15 April 2006 (PDT) | # [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 22:33, 15 April 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | # [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 19:28, 16 April 2006 (PDT) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
| - | |||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
Revision as of 02:28, 17 April 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer: Add your summary here
- Clarifies what constitutes a "properly proposed" proposal re: 104/105 (Anybody notice they're identical?) and provides a process for dealing with improper proposals.
Debate
- I'm all for it. Anyone have any suggestions or should we just bring this to vote? sinblox 19:44, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
- :) Ok, let's vote! Applejuicefool 22:33, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
Vote
For
- Applejuicefool 22:33, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
- sinblox 19:28, 16 April 2006 (PDT)
Against
