Talk:353

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 21:16, 8 December 2006 (view source) TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) m (User talk:TomFoolery/My proposal workspace2 moved to Talk:353) ← Previous diff		Current revision as of 23:57, 19 December 2006 (view source) Tucana25 (Talk | contribs)
(8 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	#redirect [[Talk:Decisions of the Judge]]	+	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
		+
		+	<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
		+
		+	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
		+	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
		+	Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Debate ==
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
		+
		+	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
		+	I don't agree with this proposal based on the fact that if 1) the people still want the Judge in the position knowing full and well that the Judge just quit let them re-elect him...if he "idles" out then it's the electorate's fault and 2) again like 1 if the electorate expell a Judge and then decide that they want him back in so be it.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 23:13, 8 December 2006 (EST)
		+	<!--END DEBATE-->
		+
		+	== Vote ==
		+	Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 08:48, 16 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	I declare this proposal failed... --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 18:57, 19 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	=== For ===
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
		+	# --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 08:48, 16 December 2006 (EST)
		+	# --[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 07:25, 18 December 2006 (EST)
		+	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
		+
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
		+
		+	=== Against ===
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
		+	# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST)
		+	# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 09:31, 18 December 2006 (EST)
		+	#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
		+
		+	__NOEDITSECTION__

---

Current revision as of 23:57, 19 December 2006

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against

Proposer's summary and declarations

Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

I don't agree with this proposal based on the fact that if 1) the people still want the Judge in the position knowing full and well that the Judge just quit let them re-elect him...if he "idles" out then it's the electorate's fault and 2) again like 1 if the electorate expell a Judge and then decide that they want him back in so be it. --Dayd 23:13, 8 December 2006 (EST)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --TomFoolery 08:48, 16 December 2006 (EST)

I declare this proposal failed... --Tucana25 18:57, 19 December 2006 (EST)

For

Add FOR vote

1. --TomFoolery 08:48, 16 December 2006 (EST)
2. --Shivan 07:25, 18 December 2006 (EST)

Against

Add AGAINST vote

1. --Tucana25 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST)
2. --Dayd 09:31, 18 December 2006 (EST)