Talk:344

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(→Against)
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-
Please substitute this template. To do so add '''subst:''' in the template call. This is how it should look typed: <big><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:vote<nowiki>}}</nowiki></big> <br /> When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
+
I declare this proposal failed. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 20:59, 5 December 2006 (EST)
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
Line 21: Line 21:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
 +
# --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 19:15, 3 December 2006 (EST)
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 18:02, 3 December 2006 (EST) (This is the same idea as [[337]])
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 18:02, 3 December 2006 (EST) (This is the same idea as [[337]])
 +
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:19, 4 December 2006 (EST); (What Dayd said).
 +
#--[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 12:20, 4 December 2006 (EST)
<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
__NOEDITSECTION__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Current revision as of 01:59, 6 December 2006

I declare this proposal failed. --Dayd 20:59, 5 December 2006 (EST)

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Debate will end for this proposal on Monday December 4, 2006 at 12:01 AM EST.

This proposal combines elements from Rules 314 and 319. It addresses concerns I have regarding the process of declaring inactive status as well as returning a player to active status. Rule 111 seems to suggest that players should avoid combining two or more rule-changes in one amendment, but there are no rules preventing proposals from amending or repealing multiple rules. If anyone can find evidence to the contrary, I would be happy to split this into multiple proposals, but this seemed easier. I have explained my reasoning for proposing these rule changes in other places, but I would be happy to expound upon them if anyone missed them the first time or would prefer I state them here for archiving purposes. Let me know. --Tucana25 21:17, 1 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments As there seems to be no debate, I will open this to voting. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)


Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
  2. --TomFoolery 19:15, 3 December 2006 (EST)


Against

Add AGAINST vote

  1. --Dayd 18:02, 3 December 2006 (EST) (This is the same idea as 337)
  2. Applejuicefool 11:19, 4 December 2006 (EST); (What Dayd said).
  3. --Shivan 12:20, 4 December 2006 (EST)


Retrieved from "http://editthis.info/nomicapolis/Talk:344"
Personal tools