Talk:Judge Election

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Vote Closed)
 
(18 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-
Please substitute this template. To do so add '''subst:''' in the template call. This is how it should look typed: <big><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:vote<nowiki>}}</nowiki></big> <br /> When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
+
 
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
Line 8: Line 8:
== Debate ==
== Debate ==
-
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
+
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit&section=2 Add debate comments]
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
 +
 +
I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom.  If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling.  [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
I have fixed the link. Thanks Applejuicefool.  --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 13:09, 25 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
Since a position has never been voted on before, there are no rules about how to do it. [[User:Shivan|Shivan]] voted already, so I will follow suit, only to ensure that a quorum is met. [[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
Based on the text of rule [[321]], actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted."  That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed.  I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
I think 4 votes is enough to decide this election.  Now what...?  Also I am going to propose a rule regarding elections.  Since it seemed the natural thing to do here, i will include the nomination process used here in my proposal.  Congrats AJF. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 28 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
I appreciate everyone who has cast their vote in support of me in this Judge election. Thank you very much. However, by my reading, I am not Judge yet. Please hold off on requesting judgements until a Judge has officially been elected. I appreciate it once again, and I will do my best to make the game better when I do take office. Thanks, [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 00:28, 29 November 2006 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->
==Nominations==
==Nominations==
 +
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit&section=3 Add Nomination]
 +
 +
I nominate [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)
==Vote==
==Vote==
 +
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit&section=4 Applejuicefool]
 +
#--[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 07:43, 27 November 2006 (EST)
 +
#--[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
 +
#--[[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)
 +
#--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)
 +
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 23:02, 29 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
== Vote Closed ==
 +
 +
I declare this election closed.  Applejuicefool has been elected judge in the November special election. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 22:57, 30 November 2006 (EST)

Current revision as of 03:57, 1 December 2006


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

To debate and vote for a Judge. --TomFoolery 10:40, 25 November 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add debate comments


I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom. If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling. Applejuicefool 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST)

I have fixed the link. Thanks Applejuicefool. --TomFoolery 13:09, 25 November 2006 (EST)

Since a position has never been voted on before, there are no rules about how to do it. Shivan voted already, so I will follow suit, only to ensure that a quorum is met. TomFoolery 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)


Based on the text of rule 321, actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted." That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed. I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --Tucana25 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)

I think 4 votes is enough to decide this election. Now what...? Also I am going to propose a rule regarding elections. Since it seemed the natural thing to do here, i will include the nomination process used here in my proposal. Congrats AJF. --Tucana25 23:15, 28 November 2006 (EST)

I appreciate everyone who has cast their vote in support of me in this Judge election. Thank you very much. However, by my reading, I am not Judge yet. Please hold off on requesting judgements until a Judge has officially been elected. I appreciate it once again, and I will do my best to make the game better when I do take office. Thanks, Applejuicefool 00:28, 29 November 2006 (EST)

Nominations

Add Nomination

I nominate Applejuicefool --TomFoolery 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)

Vote

Applejuicefool

  1. --Shivan 07:43, 27 November 2006 (EST)
  2. --TomFoolery 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
  3. --Simulacrum 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)
  4. --Tucana25 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)
  5. Applejuicefool 23:02, 29 November 2006 (EST)

Vote Closed

I declare this election closed. Applejuicefool has been elected judge in the November special election. Applejuicefool 22:57, 30 November 2006 (EST)

Personal tools