Talk:368
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(i tried to let it happen...........) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | <!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| + | Proposed by: [[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 20:41, 9 January 2007 (EST) | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| - | |||
| - | + | --> | |
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS--> | <!--END INSTRUCTIONS--> | ||
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.--> | <!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.--> | ||
== Proposer's summary and declarations == | == Proposer's summary and declarations == | ||
| - | {{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}} | + | {{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 12 January 2007 (EST) <br> |
| + | This proposal is just like the last plus/minus the changes AJF wanted. Also see rule [[345]] in regards to points reset T25. So hopefully everyone's happy and if you're not, you'll abstain. | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}} | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | So, with the introduction of [[366]] governing the stages of a proposal, this means the new round would begin just as this proposal took effect and just too early for Dayd to accumulate 100 points and win as the 10 he would have gained become the first points of a new round without a winner. Or did you read that differently ;)? --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 04:18, 13 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's 200 points and points come before rule effect...that and all points are reset at the beginning of a round. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:49, 14 January 2007 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I declare this proposal failed. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:10, 21 January 2007 (EST) | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|3|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|3|Add FOR vote}} | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST) |
| + | #<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add AGAINST vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add AGAINST vote}} | ||
| + | # --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 12:37, 16 January 2007 (EST) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
=== Abstain === | === Abstain === | ||
| - | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add Abstention}} | + | By the way...the abstain link leads to an against vote, so...edit the whole page and not via the abstain link... |
| - | # <!--# ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add Abstention}} |
| + | # --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 05:19, 15 January 2007 (EST) (I know its probably different for the rest of you, but I don't feel I'm ready for a new round just yet.) | ||
| + | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 19:59, 15 January 2007 (EST) (I still don't really know that i like this much better than the last one, but at least its three months...) | ||
| + | #<!--# ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Current revision as of 04:10, 22 January 2007
Proposed by: Dayd 20:41, 9 January 2007 (EST)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer's summary
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 12 January 2007 (EST)
This proposal is just like the last plus/minus the changes AJF wanted. Also see rule 345 in regards to points reset T25. So hopefully everyone's happy and if you're not, you'll abstain.
Debate
So, with the introduction of 366 governing the stages of a proposal, this means the new round would begin just as this proposal took effect and just too early for Dayd to accumulate 100 points and win as the 10 he would have gained become the first points of a new round without a winner. Or did you read that differently ;)? --Finisterre 04:18, 13 January 2007 (EST)
It's 200 points and points come before rule effect...that and all points are reset at the beginning of a round. --Dayd 21:49, 14 January 2007 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Dayd 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST)
I declare this proposal failed. --Tucana25 23:10, 21 January 2007 (EST)
For
- --Dayd 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST)
Against
- --TomFoolery 12:37, 16 January 2007 (EST)
Abstain
By the way...the abstain link leads to an against vote, so...edit the whole page and not via the abstain link... Add Abstention
- --Finisterre 05:19, 15 January 2007 (EST) (I know its probably different for the rest of you, but I don't feel I'm ready for a new round just yet.)
- --Tucana25 19:59, 15 January 2007 (EST) (I still don't really know that i like this much better than the last one, but at least its three months...)
