Talk:368
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST) | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|3|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|3|Add FOR vote}} | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST) |
| + | #<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
Revision as of 02:51, 15 January 2007
Proposed by: Dayd 20:41, 9 January 2007 (EST)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer's summary
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 12 January 2007 (EST)
This proposal is just like the last plus/minus the changes AJF wanted. Also see rule 345 in regards to points reset T25. So hopefully everyone's happy and if you're not, you'll abstain.
Debate
So, with the introduction of 366 governing the stages of a proposal, this means the new round would begin just as this proposal took effect and just too early for Dayd to accumulate 100 points and win as the 10 he would have gained become the first points of a new round without a winner. Or did you read that differently ;)? --Finisterre 04:18, 13 January 2007 (EST)
It's 200 points and points come before rule effect...that and all points are reset at the beginning of a round. --Dayd 21:49, 14 January 2007 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Dayd 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST)
For
- --Dayd 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST)
Against
Abstain
