User talk:Applejuicefool
From Nomicapolis
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) (→Governor General) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I have a draft proposal [[User:TomFoolery/My_proposal_workspace|here]] that I would appreciate your input on, it follows from the Governor General idea on the Game direction page. I believe that was your idea, so I am presenting this to you for input. Thanks. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 11:57, 28 November 2006 (EST) | I have a draft proposal [[User:TomFoolery/My_proposal_workspace|here]] that I would appreciate your input on, it follows from the Governor General idea on the Game direction page. I believe that was your idea, so I am presenting this to you for input. Thanks. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 11:57, 28 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've edited the GG proposal slightly to include a reference to "rounds" and to include a provision for when a clear winner isn't apparent. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 12:52, 28 November 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 28 November 2006
Welcome to the game, thanks for joining and the rule! if you need any help with the wiki or otherwise feel free to drop me a message. sinblox 21:12, 12 April 2006 (PDT)
Contents |
hey
Hey, sorry I haven't been around. I'm in exam time right now and extremely busy. Last exam is Monday but I'll try to be around a bit. sinblox 11:58, 20 April 2006 (PDT)
Welcome back
As you can see the game is back up and running. Nothing much has changed from when you last played though. As for your active status, I'm not sure if it really qualifies seeing as you actually debated a rule proposal that the debate was already closed on per rule 313. At the moment being inactive doesn't mean anything so it doesn't really matter. But you are free to actually vote on either one of the proposals. And if you don't well I plan on carrying them both tonight around midnight EST as per 313. No big deal if I have to wait an extra day to carry them. Afterward I plan on introducing some new proposals seeing that the board will be empty. Hopefully we can get to a point where everyone isn't "for" a proposal and some really good debate and hard rules start to be passed. But it's nice to see another player.
--Dayd 15:48, 14 November 2006 (EST)
Regarding your observation here.
I have been meaning to bring up a discussion on the template you mentioned as well as some of the other ones. I think that I was a bit excessive in creating some of those templates. However, I think that they might be useful with some tweaking. I look forward to seeing your views regarding them. --Simulacrum 01:23, 15 November 2006 (EST)
Regarding your idea about Supreme Grammarian
I think it would be worthwhile for that position to be created and should it come before a vote I would probably be favorable. (I don't think I would be the best choice for the job though.) --Simulacrum 02:03, 18 November 2006 (EST)
- Thanks. I've been giving it a day or two so I can go back and look at that draft proposal with fresh eyes. It is kind of long and complicated, but I don't want the position to have the potential for abuse. I will probably edit it today and then propose it. Applejuicefool 10:01, 18 November 2006 (EST)
- Sorry it failed, I am for it still. I think that if you represent it with a stipulation that the Supreme Grammarian may hold no other positions it would pass. TomFoolery 10:31, 27 November 2006 (EST)
- Crap, I picked the wrong week to take off... I wish I knew that it went up to a vote, oh well there is always another day. Simulacrum 23:35, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Governor General
I have a draft proposal here that I would appreciate your input on, it follows from the Governor General idea on the Game direction page. I believe that was your idea, so I am presenting this to you for input. Thanks. --TomFoolery 11:57, 28 November 2006 (EST)
I've edited the GG proposal slightly to include a reference to "rounds" and to include a provision for when a clear winner isn't apparent. --TomFoolery 12:52, 28 November 2006 (EST)
