Talk:Judge Election
From Nomicapolis
(→Vote) |
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) (→Debate) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I have fixed the link. Thanks Applejuicefool. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 13:09, 25 November 2006 (EST) | I have fixed the link. Thanks Applejuicefool. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 13:09, 25 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since a position has never been voted on before, there are no rules about how to do it. [[User:Shivan|Shivan]] voted already, so I will follow suit, only to ensure that a quorum is met. [[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 15:33, 27 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
To debate and vote for a Judge. --TomFoolery 10:40, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
NOTE: The link above is messed up. Please fix, then delete this note (I'd do it, but I'm not sure how).
I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom. If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling. Applejuicefool 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST)
I have fixed the link. Thanks Applejuicefool. --TomFoolery 13:09, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Since a position has never been voted on before, there are no rules about how to do it. Shivan voted already, so I will follow suit, only to ensure that a quorum is met. TomFoolery 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Nominations
I nominate Applejuicefool --TomFoolery 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
- --Shivan 07:43, 27 November 2006 (EST)
