Talk:Judge Election
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | NOTE: The link above is messed up. Please fix, then delete this note (I'd do it, but I'm not sure how). | ||
| + | |||
| + | I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom. If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 25 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
To debate and vote for a Judge. --TomFoolery 10:40, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Election&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments NOTE: The link above is messed up. Please fix, then delete this note (I'd do it, but I'm not sure how).
I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom. If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling. Applejuicefool 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Nominations
I nominate Applejuicefool --TomFoolery 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)
