Discussion page: BZP thread
From Modpedia
m (→Question! :P) |
(→Question! :P) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
I think putting up a BZP article would be asking for trouble. It is sad that it has to be that way, but true. I think the focus should be on MOD and FOD alone. - TOS | I think putting up a BZP article would be asking for trouble. It is sad that it has to be that way, but true. I think the focus should be on MOD and FOD alone. - TOS | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you have a BZP article, you will probably need to put extra maintenance into it and defend against flamers from both sides of the issue. If it gets out of hand, you may get into trouble at BZP because of it. I doubt it would serve much purpose- people who think MoD is a bunch of BZP-banned-bashers are not likely to visit this site to be undeceived. -tE3 | ||
Current revision as of 03:32, 3 November 2006
Question! :P
Do we really, really need the BZP page? I don't think we do, I mean MoDpedia is almost completley about things internal to MoD. It's just not needed in my opinion. Thoughts?
Hmm...~R
I...guess we should, possibly outlining the member-created 'rivalry' between MoD and BZP. ~Phil the Le-Koronan 19:04, 30 October 2006 (EST)
Maybe, It would be good to have opinions of the site by most of our members in order to show that we aren't all rabid BZP haters. --Abyss 20:50, 30 October 2006 (EST)
I agree with Abyss. By showing our opinions, we could help the future of MoD jhave a better relationship with BZP. ~Vahiki
One problem Vahiki, BZP can't link here. So it doesn't really matter what we say. Get rid of the BZP page, this is MODpedia after all. ~Brogen
I don't mind there being a thing on saying a simple discription about BZP. As long as it does not diss it, or make BZP sound bad in any way. But as the others said, it would be a very nice way to show that we do not really bash BZP. ~KL
My opinion? Since you're already decided to remove it soonish anyway, why not just do so? You're admins, we're lowly members. (That is, until BS01 goes back up ^_~ Then welcome to mah world~) Why ask us? Make a decision und commit to it. Besides, we have a history page and a restore option for a reason... if you don't like it deleted, you can always restore it *thumbs up* --Swert of BS01 11:45, 1 November 2006 (EST)
This is a MoDpedia. Not a BZPedia. It should focus on MoD - it's barely even worth focussing on Bionicle itself at all. But yeah, also what Swert said.
I think putting up a BZP article would be asking for trouble. It is sad that it has to be that way, but true. I think the focus should be on MOD and FOD alone. - TOS
If you have a BZP article, you will probably need to put extra maintenance into it and defend against flamers from both sides of the issue. If it gets out of hand, you may get into trouble at BZP because of it. I doubt it would serve much purpose- people who think MoD is a bunch of BZP-banned-bashers are not likely to visit this site to be undeceived. -tE3
