Discussion page: BZP thread
From Modpedia
(→Question! :P) |
Kopaka Lady (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
One problem Vahiki, BZP can't link here. So it doesn't really matter what we say. Get rid of the BZP page, this is MODpedia after all. ~Brogen | One problem Vahiki, BZP can't link here. So it doesn't really matter what we say. Get rid of the BZP page, this is MODpedia after all. ~Brogen | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't mind there being a thing on saying a simple discription about BZP. As long as it does not diss it, or make BZP sound bad in any way. But as the others said, it would be a very nice way to show that we do not really bash BZP. ~KL | ||
Revision as of 04:10, 1 November 2006
Question! :P
Do we really, really need the BZP page? I don't think we do, I mean MoDpedia is almost completley about things internal to MoD. It's just not needed in my opinion. Thoughts?
Hmm...~R
I...guess we should, possibly outlining the member-created 'rivalry' between MoD and BZP. ~Phil the Le-Koronan 19:04, 30 October 2006 (EST)
Maybe, It would be good to have opinions of the site by most of our members in order to show that we aren't all rabid BZP haters. --Abyss 20:50, 30 October 2006 (EST)
I agree with Abyss. By showing our opinions, we could help the future of MoD jhave a better relationship with BZP. ~Vahiki
One problem Vahiki, BZP can't link here. So it doesn't really matter what we say. Get rid of the BZP page, this is MODpedia after all. ~Brogen
I don't mind there being a thing on saying a simple discription about BZP. As long as it does not diss it, or make BZP sound bad in any way. But as the others said, it would be a very nice way to show that we do not really bash BZP. ~KL
