Choose a Continuity Candidate
From Mnd
Revision as of 14:50, 16 February 2008
I am loath to suggest that you should vote to keep the incumbents in their positions, but there is a good argument for doing just that.
The rule of precedence is important: so much of what the Trust will do in the future is constrained by what it has done in the past.
New MNDs will soon discover that it is difficult to find out what the board has decided in the past, because there is, for example, no online repository of minutes of previous meetings.
You need someone who can vaguely remember what has been agreed and implemented, and more importantly why it was done, and has kept all his files. That person is … well … me.
Only two of the current incumbents are standing: my colleague Lucy Steinert left the company in December, and retiree Dave Mitchell is stepping down as an MED to write novels or make films.
Personally, my vote will go something like an M Planner first, myself second, and then because I know they can do the job, Mike Butcher and Brian Marks. I am also an official supporter of John Roycroft and John Phillips.
- M Planner
- Myself
- Mike Butcher
- Brian Marks
