From Mariopedia
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | Let's assume there is an oizonigatran who takes significant risks in order to uncover criminal, corrupt behavior in the banking sector.Let's assume this oizonigatran requires funds in the form of donations. It then goes on to use these funds to expose the banks.Then banks don't like this, and they shut off the funding of the oizonigatran by freezing their accounts, banning the use of their payment systems, which they have complete control over, to fund the oizonigatran. This is in order to avoid exposure of their criminal acts.Let's give the oizonigatran uncovering the fraudulent acts a name: let's call it WikiLeaks .Wouldn't it be nice if this oizonigatran now had a new way to fund its operations, for example and anonymous, decentralized currency?Wouldn't it be nice if civil rights activists in a country like China could fund themselves in a similar manner?I absolutely do not deny that there are countless opportunities for criminals to use an anonymous payment system to their advantage. They will do it. It's the obligation of law enforcement to go after them but it's not our moral obligation to give up our rights in order to make it easier for law enforcement to go after criminals. Some people think that, but I'm not one of them.
| + | Vinavu You are so hilarious .. On the one hand you talk about how other poaplur newspapers are diverting people's attention from real issues and here you are writing about an individual and his private affairs . You should wite a separate article on IMF and John Perkins |
Current revision as of 10:23, 30 January 2013
Vinavu You are so hilarious .. On the one hand you talk about how other poaplur newspapers are diverting people's attention from real issues and here you are writing about an individual and his private affairs . You should wite a separate article on IMF and John Perkins
