Talk:Main Page
From Lunar Shadow Project Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
That could work; I've added a table to the main page. The way the table is now, both canon and non-canon characters are in the same column, and the same with the Lunar Shadow universe column. Probably will change later, but it helps to have an idea of the wiki markup, at least. (Also, no, that's not a mistake; the Sea Zone is ''not'' a castle area, despite being entered from the castle.) --[[User:Kim|Kim]] 09:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | That could work; I've added a table to the main page. The way the table is now, both canon and non-canon characters are in the same column, and the same with the Lunar Shadow universe column. Probably will change later, but it helps to have an idea of the wiki markup, at least. (Also, no, that's not a mistake; the Sea Zone is ''not'' a castle area, despite being entered from the castle.) --[[User:Kim|Kim]] 09:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Based on how it looks, I would say it looks alright. Though, I believe that ''maybe'' a few more characters, etc. would work better (rather than just three of them). --[[User:Malice|Malice]] 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 21 January 2016
Boring main page
Okay, so the main page is really bland at this moment, and will obviously be updated later on. Any ideas? --Kim 22:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
How about, to start out with, put a list of games, characters, and areas, then expand it from there later? --Pteriforever 04:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
That could work; I've added a table to the main page. The way the table is now, both canon and non-canon characters are in the same column, and the same with the Lunar Shadow universe column. Probably will change later, but it helps to have an idea of the wiki markup, at least. (Also, no, that's not a mistake; the Sea Zone is not a castle area, despite being entered from the castle.) --Kim 09:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Based on how it looks, I would say it looks alright. Though, I believe that maybe a few more characters, etc. would work better (rather than just three of them). --Malice 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
