User:MargeneLeija

From Lavosfantasy

(Difference between revisions)
(The Importance And Advantages Of Software Engineering In The Advancement Of The World)
(Understand more about software engineer interview questions)
Line 1: Line 1:
   
   
-
Software is often dubbed as the soul of computers. The importance of software can be seen in the existence of the three most popular and useful applications and websites ever made by man--Microsoft, Google and Facebook. Software, by definition, is comprised of computer step-by-step instructions which are stored electronically to produce devices called hardware. Software includes operating systems, computer applications, management systems and basically all programs that make the computers function for a specific job. In simple devices such as phones or calculators, software is needed to make them function. Realizing the need of software, we also come to recognize the need of software engineers. Software engineers generally work in a team composed of programmers and computer software experts to create computer codes for a desired application, or make updates or changes for an existing one. They supervise and direct people in the designing, construction and implementation of programs by demonstrating to the programmers the specific functions needed and defined by the client.  
+
The title of "software engineer" has got to be among the most highly abused in the corporate high-tech world. It's also one of the most popular.
 +
 +
And why not? It sounds a lot better than "computer programmer," and it looks much better on one's business card. Unfortunately, it's often inaccurate. Engineering is, after all, the application of sound technical principles to develop systems that are robust, efficient and elegant. I've found that a great many software engineers can develop working programs, but do little or no real engineering design.
 +
 +
Does this sound harsh? Perhaps, but I've also found it hard to deny. I've encountered very few software engineers, for example, who have clean, crisp and readable coding styles--an essential element of elegant software design. I've also encountered a preponderance of cryptically written functions, clumsy software abstractions and bizarre spaghetti code. To my dismay, I've discovered that even among computer science graduates, many reduce object-oriented programming to the mere use of private data, public functions and object instantiations. It's enough to break a teacher's heart.
 +
 +
Now, I won't go so far as to say that most programmers write spaghetti code. That would not be fair. However, I do think that relatively few programmers have a deep appreciation for the artistry of software development. That's not to say that they're ignorant of such things; not at all. Rather, it's more that the engineering aspects of elegant code design are all too often neglected.
 +
 +
I think this happens because modern programming tools have made proper code design seem like a nuisance. In the early years of computing, people were forced to write out their software designs, pondering many fine details before they ever sat down in front of the computer. Nowadays, with our fast compilers and interactive debugging systems, programmers often find it more convenient to simply sit down and start coding, with just a modicum of software design. Mind you, I do understand that this is sometimes more efficient--when the programming task is fairly routine, for example. However, when such design-as-you-go software development becomes standard practice, then you have the makings of utter chaos.  
   
   
software engineering computer engineers developers technology science systems engineer programming professional degrees work development programs edit employment retrieved process model design degree se education code people certification job related program scott tucker term computing ieee practitioners statistics occupations tools scott tucker management programmers time needed labor occupation articles system title skills level technologies society  
software engineering computer engineers developers technology science systems engineer programming professional degrees work development programs edit employment retrieved process model design degree se education code people certification job related program scott tucker term computing ieee practitioners statistics occupations tools scott tucker management programmers time needed labor occupation articles system title skills level technologies society  
   
   
-
With the constant need of software by many businesses, Software Engineering Jobs have become the target of many young people who want to start a successful career. Software Engineering is concentrated in the development and maintenance of software systems that are highly needed for different reasons and work settings. This job is very important because they spearhead the creation of small and large software systems using in-depth critical thinking and analyzing. Software Engineers do not necessarily do the programming per se because professional programmers are employed do all the coding. Their main job, however, is to find the perfect approach to create a highly-functional program or application. In this course of job, it is very essential to have immense knowledge in mathematics and computer science because these subjects contribute to the planning and execution of the project. Although they do not do the actual programming, they should be acquainted of the programming languages and how it works. Excellent communication skills are also important for a good working relationship within the team or with the client. Most especially, they should imbibe leadership quality in order to meet goals and promote better work management. Before looking for Software Engineering Jobs, however, one must have a degree in Computer Science or courses that highly integrated Mathematics and critical-thinking. As what they would say, the importance of software just keeps on getting higher. More and more businesses are using software to improve their quality of services. Computer software is definitely and continually changing the world, thus, the need for software engineers are increasing. Employment will never drop off simply because as long as computers are utilized and technology never stops improving, software will forever exist. This job may bring about intense competition among software engineers vying for a good project so rigid training, analytical skills and huge knowledge and understanding will bring one to the top among others.  
+
In part, this problem is also rooted in the malleable nature of computer software. No self-respecting civil engineer would design a bridge by slapping girders together until he has something that works; after all, if the bridge collapses, it could take months to rebuild it. Similarly, no sensible architect would want to build a house without blueprints and floor plans. Yet it is commonplace for programmers to develop software using poorly chosen functions and only the sketchiest of designs. After all, if the software doesn't work, they can always find the bug and fix it--at least, in theory. In practice, these bugs are often difficult to detect, and fixing them can require extensive surgery. The consequences of an ill-designed software program can be disastrous indeed.  
   
   
-
Choosing a good company to work at can be easily done with MAS Tech Jobs. The agency has over a decade experience in finding the best working location with wide options to choose from. When looking for a reliable and trusted mediator, the agency is just the right one.
+
For this reason, I believe that high-tech companies need to give software engineering the respect that it deserves. They need to develop a true culture of systematic software design, instead of merely settling for "whatever works." A company that's looking toward the future must pay proper devotion to the principles of software maintainability, proper documentation and elegant, robust design. It must also inculcate a culture of true software engineering among its employees. The failure to do so may work in the short-term, but it is a recipe for long-term disaster.

Revision as of 00:01, 17 January 2014

The title of "software engineer" has got to be among the most highly abused in the corporate high-tech world. It's also one of the most popular.

And why not? It sounds a lot better than "computer programmer," and it looks much better on one's business card. Unfortunately, it's often inaccurate. Engineering is, after all, the application of sound technical principles to develop systems that are robust, efficient and elegant. I've found that a great many software engineers can develop working programs, but do little or no real engineering design.

Does this sound harsh? Perhaps, but I've also found it hard to deny. I've encountered very few software engineers, for example, who have clean, crisp and readable coding styles--an essential element of elegant software design. I've also encountered a preponderance of cryptically written functions, clumsy software abstractions and bizarre spaghetti code. To my dismay, I've discovered that even among computer science graduates, many reduce object-oriented programming to the mere use of private data, public functions and object instantiations. It's enough to break a teacher's heart.

Now, I won't go so far as to say that most programmers write spaghetti code. That would not be fair. However, I do think that relatively few programmers have a deep appreciation for the artistry of software development. That's not to say that they're ignorant of such things; not at all. Rather, it's more that the engineering aspects of elegant code design are all too often neglected.

I think this happens because modern programming tools have made proper code design seem like a nuisance. In the early years of computing, people were forced to write out their software designs, pondering many fine details before they ever sat down in front of the computer. Nowadays, with our fast compilers and interactive debugging systems, programmers often find it more convenient to simply sit down and start coding, with just a modicum of software design. Mind you, I do understand that this is sometimes more efficient--when the programming task is fairly routine, for example. However, when such design-as-you-go software development becomes standard practice, then you have the makings of utter chaos.

software engineering computer engineers developers technology science systems engineer programming professional degrees work development programs edit employment retrieved process model design degree se education code people certification job related program scott tucker term computing ieee practitioners statistics occupations tools scott tucker management programmers time needed labor occupation articles system title skills level technologies society

In part, this problem is also rooted in the malleable nature of computer software. No self-respecting civil engineer would design a bridge by slapping girders together until he has something that works; after all, if the bridge collapses, it could take months to rebuild it. Similarly, no sensible architect would want to build a house without blueprints and floor plans. Yet it is commonplace for programmers to develop software using poorly chosen functions and only the sketchiest of designs. After all, if the software doesn't work, they can always find the bug and fix it--at least, in theory. In practice, these bugs are often difficult to detect, and fixing them can require extensive surgery. The consequences of an ill-designed software program can be disastrous indeed.

For this reason, I believe that high-tech companies need to give software engineering the respect that it deserves. They need to develop a true culture of systematic software design, instead of merely settling for "whatever works." A company that's looking toward the future must pay proper devotion to the principles of software maintainability, proper documentation and elegant, robust design. It must also inculcate a culture of true software engineering among its employees. The failure to do so may work in the short-term, but it is a recipe for long-term disaster.

Personal tools