Spelling and other mistakes to avoid
From Lauraibm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Spelling) |
(→Sentence construction) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Sentence construction== | ==Sentence construction== | ||
* Avoid joining two sentences with a comma. | * Avoid joining two sentences with a comma. | ||
| - | + | ::For example: ''Within the UK, IT accounts for 4% of total greenhouse gas emissions, it is vital for CIOs to act now in order to reduce these emissions.'' is really two sentences, which should be expressed either separately as: | |
| - | + | :::''Within the UK, IT accounts for 4% of total greenhouse gas emissions. It is vital for CIOs to act now in order to reduce these emissions.'', | |
| - | + | ::or with the use of an appropriate conjunction such as: | |
| + | :::''Within the UK, IT accounts for 4% of total greenhouse gas emissions, so it is vital for CIOs to act now in order to reduce these emissions.'' | ||
Revision as of 12:20, 30 October 2007
Spelling
- over time vs. overtime.
- This is incorrect: 'overtime this group has expanded...'
Sentence construction
- Avoid joining two sentences with a comma.
- For example: Within the UK, IT accounts for 4% of total greenhouse gas emissions, it is vital for CIOs to act now in order to reduce these emissions. is really two sentences, which should be expressed either separately as:
- Within the UK, IT accounts for 4% of total greenhouse gas emissions. It is vital for CIOs to act now in order to reduce these emissions.,
- or with the use of an appropriate conjunction such as:
- Within the UK, IT accounts for 4% of total greenhouse gas emissions, so it is vital for CIOs to act now in order to reduce these emissions.
- For example: Within the UK, IT accounts for 4% of total greenhouse gas emissions, it is vital for CIOs to act now in order to reduce these emissions. is really two sentences, which should be expressed either separately as:
