Vendor Comparison Table
From Lauraibm
(Difference between revisions)
												
			   
		|  (→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |  (→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| !! colspan="6" align="center" | Software vendors | !! colspan="6" align="center" | Software vendors | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| - | ! Activity !!style="background:#ffdead;"| IB  | + | ! Activity !!style="background:#ffdead;"| IB ! | 
| - | AC   | + | ! AC   | 
| ! BT    | ! BT    | ||
| ! CG   | ! CG   | ||
Revision as of 08:20, 19 August 2007
| Contents | 
Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations
Ordered by type of vendor:
- IBM first, then predominantly services vendors, then predominantly hardware vendors, then predominantly software vendors.
- Alphabetically within vendor type (though as the spare columns become used, this will be less so)
 
| Services vendors | Hardware vendors | Software vendors | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity | IB ! | AC | BT | CG | ! CT | ! CS | ! ED | ! FU | ! IS | ! TC | ! WI | ! s1 | ! s2 | ! s3 | ! DE | ! HP | ! SU | ! s4 | ! s5 | ! MS | ! OR | ! s6 | ! s7 | ! s8 | ! s9 | 
| ISO 14001 | Δ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green Offerings available to Clients of the Vendor
Activities of the Vendor that are Destructive to the Environment
Key to Vendors listed in Tables
In alphabetical order:
- AC: Accenture
- BT: BT Global Services
- CG: Capgemini
- CT: Capita
- CS: CSC
- DE: Dell
- ED: EDS
- FU: Fujitsu Services
- HP: HP
- IB: IBM
- IS: Infosys
- MS: Microsoft
- OR: Oracle
- s1: (spare)
- s2: (spare)
- .
- s9: (etc)
- SU: Sun
- TC: TCS
- WI: Wipro
