Vendor Comparison Table
From Lauraibm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Row heading 1 | ! Row heading 1 | ||
| - | | Cell 2 | | + | | Cell 2 || Cell 3 |
| - | | Cell 3 | + | |
|- | |- | ||
! Row heading A | ! Row heading A | ||
Revision as of 07:46, 19 August 2007
Contents |
Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations
| Activity | IB | AC | BT | CG | CT | CS | ED | FU | IS | TC | WI | sp | sp | sp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Row heading 1 | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | ||||||||||||
| Row heading A | Cell B | Cell C |
Green Offerings available to Clients of the Vendor
Activities of the Vendor that are Destructive to the Environment
Key to Vendors listed in Tables
- AC: Accenture
- BT: BT Global Services
- CG: Capgemini
- CT: Capita
- CS: CSC
- ED: EDS
- FU: Fujitsu Services
- IB: IBM
- IS: Infosys
- sp: (spare)
- TC: TCS
- WI: Wipro
