Editing 20110105 Lecture 4 notes.txt

From Iusmphysiology

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Current revision Your text
Line 226: Line 226:
**the densitiy of specific mechanoreceptors
**the densitiy of specific mechanoreceptors
**the receptive field size of specific mechanoreceptors
**the receptive field size of specific mechanoreceptors
-
***one cannot distinguish between two stimuli in the same field so when receptive fields are large, two distinct stimuli must be farther apart than when the receptive field is smaller
+
***one cannot distinguish between two stimuli in the same field so when receptive fields are large, two distinct stimuli must  
 +
 
 +
be farther apart than when the receptive field is smaller
*Pacinian and ruffini have large receptive fields
*Pacinian and ruffini have large receptive fields
**Within the field, there is an area of highest sensitivity--near the nerve terminal, presumably.
**Within the field, there is an area of highest sensitivity--near the nerve terminal, presumably.
Line 235: Line 237:
*started here on 01/06/11 at 11AM.
*started here on 01/06/11 at 11AM.
 +
===Pain (stimulus noxious to the body)===
===Pain (stimulus noxious to the body)===

Please note that all contributions to Iusmphysiology may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Iusmphysiology:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!


Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
Personal tools