Main Page

From Ibstudy

Revision as of 20:37, 10 November 2015 (edit) 12.150.226.18 (Talk) (hghyvbso7) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 20:42, 10 November 2015 (edit) (undo) 221.178.182.63 (Talk) (cfABRWpVH) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	I'm taking my eeorpymls to a Tribunal and the disciplinary system is only really used by the management to settle personal scores. If everything disciplinary for like for like offences was harsh, that would be consistent and in it's own way, then fair enough.But if the offender is a management favourite they can be amazingly lenient for serious offences. They have given me some contradictory ones and are withholding others.  How do I go about finding out information that they don't want me to know?Any good ideas please?	+	Did anyone see how long Drogba plyaed after the whistle last night, before miming that he couldn't hear it? He dribbled another 20 yards after some heinous Chelsea foul / hideous Benfica dive (reverse order or delete as applicable) and rounded at least one more defender, who was gesturing for the return of the ball, before the ref got his attention (using what, telepathy? a half brick to the back of the head?). That was a match situation where time wasting definitely conveyed an advantage as well. I'd have given him three red cards, personally (assume this is now allowed under the Graham Poll amendment). One rule for everyone! 1  0

---

Revision as of 20:42, 10 November 2015

Did anyone see how long Drogba plyaed after the whistle last night, before miming that he couldn't hear it? He dribbled another 20 yards after some heinous Chelsea foul / hideous Benfica dive (reverse order or delete as applicable) and rounded at least one more defender, who was gesturing for the return of the ball, before the ref got his attention (using what, telepathy? a half brick to the back of the head?). That was a match situation where time wasting definitely conveyed an advantage as well. I'd have given him three red cards, personally (assume this is now allowed under the Graham Poll amendment). One rule for everyone! 1 0