NARTH

From Hate

(Difference between revisions)
(+site)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NARTH '''National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality]''', perhaps better known as '''NARTH''', was founded in 1992 and prides itself as a "non-profit, educational organization dedicated to the research, therapy and prevention of homosexuality". NARTH lists over a 1,000 as employees, ranging from psychiatrists to social workers. According to [http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_nart.htm ReligiousTolerance.org], NARTH is the only professional mental health organisation in the United States that still lists homosexuality as a disorder.
+
{{Site|http://www.narth.org}}The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NARTH '''National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality]''', perhaps better known as '''NARTH''', was founded in 1992 and prides itself as a "non-profit, educational organization dedicated to the research, therapy and prevention of homosexuality". NARTH lists over a 1,000 as employees, ranging from psychiatrists to social workers. According to [http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_nart.htm ReligiousTolerance.org], NARTH is the only professional mental health organisation in the United States that still lists homosexuality as a disorder.
==Quotes==
==Quotes==

Revision as of 14:05, 17 June 2006

Official website
The National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, perhaps better known as NARTH, was founded in 1992 and prides itself as a "non-profit, educational organization dedicated to the research, therapy and prevention of homosexuality". NARTH lists over a 1,000 as employees, ranging from psychiatrists to social workers. According to ReligiousTolerance.org, NARTH is the only professional mental health organisation in the United States that still lists homosexuality as a disorder.

Quotes

1 (Freedom to be gay or lesbian) has become an invitation for increased sexual promiscuity, and results in the increase of sexually transmitted disease. (src)


2 (T)he willingness of the Court to remove important social disputes from the democratic process does not bode well for the family in America. (On the invalidation by the US Supreme Court of a Texas sodomy law; src)

Personal tools