Squirrelism
From Govteenwiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Affiliations) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Affiliations== | ==Affiliations== | ||
| - | Seated with the GovNinjas and Govism, Squirrelism still retains a small influence. | + | Seated with the GovNinjas and Govism through a formal [http://forums.govteen.com/showthread.php?t=163262&highlight=squirrelism truce]., Squirrelism still retains a small influence. |
==Argument== | ==Argument== | ||
Often used to demonstrate the fallacy of not being able to prove a religion "wrong" to assert it's existance, the following is an example. | Often used to demonstrate the fallacy of not being able to prove a religion "wrong" to assert it's existance, the following is an example. | ||
StandardState: "I like the way you set the positive (proving it) and negative (disproving it) as somehow having equal force. It is that attitude that will topple christianity in favor of squirrelism, a set of beliefs that also cannot be disproved!" | StandardState: "I like the way you set the positive (proving it) and negative (disproving it) as somehow having equal force. It is that attitude that will topple christianity in favor of squirrelism, a set of beliefs that also cannot be disproved!" | ||
Current revision as of 23:55, 10 March 2007
Squirrelism is a Gov-created religion used in the Philosophy and Debate forums as a tool to counter typical Christian arguments.
It has since grown to be its own entity outside of the Philosophy and Debate area.
[edit] Affiliations
Seated with the GovNinjas and Govism through a formal truce., Squirrelism still retains a small influence.
[edit] Argument
Often used to demonstrate the fallacy of not being able to prove a religion "wrong" to assert it's existance, the following is an example. StandardState: "I like the way you set the positive (proving it) and negative (disproving it) as somehow having equal force. It is that attitude that will topple christianity in favor of squirrelism, a set of beliefs that also cannot be disproved!"
