Talk:Basics
From Gamedozer
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should the '''Basics''' Section be broken up into seperate articles? I can just foresee this as becoming a lengthy and jumbled section. Anybody have any thoughts? | Should the '''Basics''' Section be broken up into seperate articles? I can just foresee this as becoming a lengthy and jumbled section. Anybody have any thoughts? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Methinks this was Urban who posted this? I think it does need to be broken up into separate articles, at least the Units list should be in a separate article, and there should be an article regarding each individual unit as well. That way, we can have in-depth information, not only factual but also strategic and tactical, for each unit without clogging a large, important article. [[User:Strategia|Strategia]] 10:59, 1 March 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 1 March 2006
Should the Basics Section be broken up into seperate articles? I can just foresee this as becoming a lengthy and jumbled section. Anybody have any thoughts?
Methinks this was Urban who posted this? I think it does need to be broken up into separate articles, at least the Units list should be in a separate article, and there should be an article regarding each individual unit as well. That way, we can have in-depth information, not only factual but also strategic and tactical, for each unit without clogging a large, important article. Strategia 10:59, 1 March 2006 (PST)
