Cw9:8299
From Environmental Technology
(Difference between revisions)
Jalcst-8299 (Talk | contribs) |
(graded) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Graded}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{OK}} | ||
1. High fuel cost, technology limited, lower vehicle range, limit of supplies | 1. High fuel cost, technology limited, lower vehicle range, limit of supplies | ||
- | + | {{OK}} | |
2.to cut down on the automobile pollution and help the ozone problems | 2.to cut down on the automobile pollution and help the ozone problems | ||
- | + | {{OK}} | |
3. yes | 3. yes | ||
- | + | {{OK}} | |
4.No. 2 diesel 8-15, biodiesel 25, gasoline 86-94, methanol 100, ethanol 100, LPG 104, LNG 120+, CNG 120+, hydrogen 130+ | 4.No. 2 diesel 8-15, biodiesel 25, gasoline 86-94, methanol 100, ethanol 100, LPG 104, LNG 120+, CNG 120+, hydrogen 130+ | ||
- | + | {{OK}} | |
5.CNG | 5.CNG | ||
- | + | {{OK}} | |
6.No. 2 Diesel, biodiesel, gasoline, LPG, ethanol, LNG, methanol, CNG | 6.No. 2 Diesel, biodiesel, gasoline, LPG, ethanol, LNG, methanol, CNG |
Current revision as of 13:56, 1 May 2006
G |
OK |
1. High fuel cost, technology limited, lower vehicle range, limit of supplies
OK |
2.to cut down on the automobile pollution and help the ozone problems
OK |
3. yes
OK |
4.No. 2 diesel 8-15, biodiesel 25, gasoline 86-94, methanol 100, ethanol 100, LPG 104, LNG 120+, CNG 120+, hydrogen 130+
OK |
5.CNG
OK |
6.No. 2 Diesel, biodiesel, gasoline, LPG, ethanol, LNG, methanol, CNG