HW8-2391
From Environmental Technology
(Difference between revisions)
Jalcst-2391 (Talk | contribs) |
Jalcst-2391 (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
c]Which side is right? Or more right? Is there a right? | c]Which side is right? Or more right? Is there a right? | ||
*I do not think that there is a right but the groups that are oppose the legislation are more right because the people of the US has the right to say what should or shouldn't go on in our own conntry. | *I do not think that there is a right but the groups that are oppose the legislation are more right because the people of the US has the right to say what should or shouldn't go on in our own conntry. | ||
| + | |||
| + | d]What might be some or a possible solution[s], or is there a solutation that is possible to make both sides happy? | ||
| + | *I don't think that there is a solution because either way the government decides there are giong to be conflicts from one or both sides. Personally I think that the US already has problems with the population and environment and if this legislation is gone through with that we would be adding to an even greater problem that we have but the government should analyze the environment and the population and make a decisin on how many immigrants the US would be able to environmentally sustain and allow so many to move to the US. | ||
Revision as of 21:48, 24 March 2006
a]What is the issue? Is it ethical for the US to mandate what the article is talking about?
- It is talking about the legislation trying to allow 20 million immigrants to move in the US. It is ethical for the US to try to stop the immigrants because the people of the US has the right to have a say so in what goes on in their own country.
b]What groups are not supporting the legislation? Is it ethical for the groups to want to stop the legislation that has been proposed?
- The groups are Minutemen, Balance, and ASAP that oppose the legislation. I think it is ethical for these groups to do this because we vote for our government to take care of the American people not to take care of other countries. But it is okay to help them out when we can.
c]Which side is right? Or more right? Is there a right?
- I do not think that there is a right but the groups that are oppose the legislation are more right because the people of the US has the right to say what should or shouldn't go on in our own conntry.
d]What might be some or a possible solution[s], or is there a solutation that is possible to make both sides happy?
- I don't think that there is a solution because either way the government decides there are giong to be conflicts from one or both sides. Personally I think that the US already has problems with the population and environment and if this legislation is gone through with that we would be adding to an even greater problem that we have but the government should analyze the environment and the population and make a decisin on how many immigrants the US would be able to environmentally sustain and allow so many to move to the US.
