CW8:7742

From Environmental Technology

(Difference between revisions)
(graded)
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Graded}}
Smart growth vs. sprawl
Smart growth vs. sprawl
-
 
+
{{OK}}
a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.
a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.
 +
{{OK}}
 +
b) We should use the space of buisnesses that have closed down if possible and just improve the existing building don't just put up another store across town when the existing one is doing well.
 +
 +
Management Plan
 +
{{OK}}
 +
c) The emphasis on helping save the few remaining species in the Bay area.
 +
{{OK}}
 +
d)Both sides are having problems giving up anything.  The public wants to enjoy the parks but don't want to help clean them up or be responsible for the welfare of the parks and animals living in them. 
 +
{{OK}}
 +
e)No. The solution is too little, too late they should have done something 20 years ago when the first signs were noticable of degradation of the parks.

Current revision as of 14:36, 3 April 2006

G

Smart growth vs. sprawl

OK

a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.

OK

b) We should use the space of buisnesses that have closed down if possible and just improve the existing building don't just put up another store across town when the existing one is doing well.

Management Plan

OK

c) The emphasis on helping save the few remaining species in the Bay area.

OK

d)Both sides are having problems giving up anything. The public wants to enjoy the parks but don't want to help clean them up or be responsible for the welfare of the parks and animals living in them.

OK

e)No. The solution is too little, too late they should have done something 20 years ago when the first signs were noticable of degradation of the parks.

Personal tools