Bonus-2391
From Environmental Technology
(Difference between revisions)
Jalcst-2391 (Talk | contribs) (→Bonus) |
m (fix) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Graded}} | ||
==Bonus== | ==Bonus== | ||
| - | + | *Is it morally correct for religious extremists to impose their beliefs against abortion by bombing OB/GYN clinics in the US? After reading the above material, which is more important, anti-abortionism or environmental protection? Explain sides and rationally compare and contrast both sides. | |
| - | *I don't think that the people that are against abortion should go as far as bombing clinics but they could show their beliefs in other ways like pickiting clinics or starting a group that could help people that are pregnant or they could even look at the situations around where they are living and try support groups that could help to prevent problems where unwanted births usually occur. I think that environmental protection is more important than anti-abortionism because if people would take care of the environment more then they would eliminate a lot of problems that cause abortions. In some cases when a woman is pregnant and a doctor tells her that her baby will be born defected an she goes and get an abortion because of whhat the doctor says. The mother could have drank water that was not very well treated and had pollutants in it still. Another possibility coulds have been that the surroundings where the mother lived. If she lived close to a chemical plant then she could have breathed in oxygen that had chemicals in it. The same thhing if the mother lived close to say a farming area and the chemicals that the farmers use for their crops could have been passed to the mother. There are a lot of possibilities like if the mother lived in a house that had lead based paint, asbsstos, mold, carbon-dioxide that were in the house where the mother lived. If people focused on anti-abortionism the only positive that I can think of would be that it would support thhe persons religious beliefs. The negatives would be | + | *I don't think that the people that are against abortion should go as far as bombing clinics but they could show their beliefs in other ways like pickiting clinics or starting a group that could help people that are pregnant or they could even look at the situations around where they are living and try support groups that could help to prevent problems where unwanted births usually occur. I think that environmental protection is more important than anti-abortionism because if people would take care of the environment more then they would eliminate a lot of problems that cause abortions. In some cases when a woman is pregnant and a doctor tells her that her baby will be born defected an she goes and get an abortion because of whhat the doctor says. The mother could have drank water that was not very well treated and had pollutants in it still. Another possibility coulds have been that the surroundings where the mother lived. If she lived close to a chemical plant then she could have breathed in oxygen that had chemicals in it. The same thhing if the mother lived close to say a farming area and the chemicals that the farmers use for their crops could have been passed to the mother. There are a lot of possibilities like if the mother lived in a house that had lead based paint, asbsstos, mold, carbon-dioxide that were in the house where the mother lived. If people focused on anti-abortionism the only positive that I can think of would be that it would support thhe persons religious beliefs. The negatives would be that thhe population would increase, and if the mother was raped by a blood family member then thhe child would be born incest. Also the chances of a child being still born that the mother would be put throughh also if the chance that the mother could die during pregnacies or both could die. Positives for environmental protection would be that the environment would improve which in following other problems would be solved if focused more on the environment. Some negatives for environmental protection would be like say a factory is producing fog they could either shut down the factory which would eliminate the product that they produced for people or find a way to stop the fog if there is a way. Anothher negative would be like if we took away vehicles thhen people that depend on vehicles to survive and make money then people would be limited to what is within walking distance as far as working, food, house supplies. I think that this negative would effect the economy the most and would in more negatives that I can think of. |
Current revision as of 16:23, 29 March 2006
|
G |
[edit] Bonus
- Is it morally correct for religious extremists to impose their beliefs against abortion by bombing OB/GYN clinics in the US? After reading the above material, which is more important, anti-abortionism or environmental protection? Explain sides and rationally compare and contrast both sides.
- I don't think that the people that are against abortion should go as far as bombing clinics but they could show their beliefs in other ways like pickiting clinics or starting a group that could help people that are pregnant or they could even look at the situations around where they are living and try support groups that could help to prevent problems where unwanted births usually occur. I think that environmental protection is more important than anti-abortionism because if people would take care of the environment more then they would eliminate a lot of problems that cause abortions. In some cases when a woman is pregnant and a doctor tells her that her baby will be born defected an she goes and get an abortion because of whhat the doctor says. The mother could have drank water that was not very well treated and had pollutants in it still. Another possibility coulds have been that the surroundings where the mother lived. If she lived close to a chemical plant then she could have breathed in oxygen that had chemicals in it. The same thhing if the mother lived close to say a farming area and the chemicals that the farmers use for their crops could have been passed to the mother. There are a lot of possibilities like if the mother lived in a house that had lead based paint, asbsstos, mold, carbon-dioxide that were in the house where the mother lived. If people focused on anti-abortionism the only positive that I can think of would be that it would support thhe persons religious beliefs. The negatives would be that thhe population would increase, and if the mother was raped by a blood family member then thhe child would be born incest. Also the chances of a child being still born that the mother would be put throughh also if the chance that the mother could die during pregnacies or both could die. Positives for environmental protection would be that the environment would improve which in following other problems would be solved if focused more on the environment. Some negatives for environmental protection would be like say a factory is producing fog they could either shut down the factory which would eliminate the product that they produced for people or find a way to stop the fog if there is a way. Anothher negative would be like if we took away vehicles thhen people that depend on vehicles to survive and make money then people would be limited to what is within walking distance as far as working, food, house supplies. I think that this negative would effect the economy the most and would in more negatives that I can think of.
