Editing CW9-2391

1]The disadvantage of switching to a cleaner fuel is that there are more and more cars on the road every year, and eventhough there are cleaner fuels it is like there is no difference in the atmosphere at all because there are more cars. If the car rate would stay the same there probably would be a difference being made. On the other hand if they dindn't make cleaner fuels there would be that much more pollution in the atmosphere than what they have already cut down on.

2]The advantage would have to be that the cleaner fuels do not emit as much carbon dioxide "green house " gases which causes global warming which would slow down. The new fuels also emit 90% less toxins and ozone forming hydrocarbons.

3]Nothing in the article never says that there are vehicles that the population uses that could use these cleaner fuels. The article did have some really good points and ways to help the environment but if there is a choice for people to buy a new car or use fuels that are already there for them to use more than likely people are not going to buy a new car. That is only if there are not car ready fuels out in the population.

4]Electricity[N/A], Biodiesel, Diesel no.2, Gasoline, Ethanol, Methanol, Liquified Petrolem Gas, CNG, LNG, Hydrogen.

5]The article says that almost every vehicle can operate on gasoline and atleast one other alternative fuel. Gasoline and deisel are the most used fuels.

6]NO.2 Diesel, Gasoline, Biodiesel, Methanol, CNG, LNG, Ethanol, Liquified Pertolem Gas, Electricty and Hydrogen are not rated.

7]The safest fuel would have to be Biodiesel.

8]Althoughy the web site is a government site there is no way of telling if the information is accurate or not but you could get a hold of the EPA to see if the facts are true on the charts. To me it seems like the EPA is the only organization that tells the truth or finds the truth in everything.